| | Page | |
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
Delaware | | | 3674 | | | 81-4816270 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Andrea L. Nicolás, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP One Manhattan West New York, New York 10001 (212) 735-3000 | | | Jacob D. Wolf, Esq. General Counsel and Secretary FTC Solar, Inc. 9020 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite I-260, Austin, Texas 78759 (737) 787-7906 | | | Benjamin K. Marsh, Esq. Goodwin Procter LLP 620 Eighth Avenue New York, New York 10018 (212) 813-8800 |
Large accelerated filer | | | ☐ | | | Accelerated filer | | | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | | | ☒ | | | Smaller reporting company | | | ☐ |
| | | | Emerging growth company | | | ☒ |
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered | | | Amount to be Registered(1) | | | Proposed Maximum Offering Price per Share(1) | | | Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)(2) | | | Amount of Registration Fee(3) |
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share | | | 21,184,210 | | | $20.00 | | | $423,684,200 | | | $46,224.00 |
(1) | Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933. |
(2) | Includes shares which may be sold pursuant to the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. |
(3) | Of this amount, the Registrant previously paid $46,224.00 of the total registration fee in connection with the previous filings of the Registration Statement. |
PROSPECTUS | | |
| | Per Share | | | Total | |
Public offering price | | | $ | | | $ |
Underwriting discounts and commissions(a) | | | $ | | | $ |
Proceeds to us before expenses | | | $ | | | $ |
(a) | See “Underwriting” for a complete description of the compensation payable to the underwriters. |
Barclays | | | BofA Securities | | | Credit Suisse | | | UBS Investment Bank |
HSBC | |||
Cowen | Simmons Energy | A Division of Piper Sandler | Raymond James | Roth Capital Partners |
• | Allied Market Research – Solar Energy Market by Technology, Solar Module, Application and End-Use: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2019-2026 |
• | Australia Clean Energy Council – Clean Energy Australia Report 2020 |
• | Black & Veatch Holding Company (“Black & Veatch”) – Voyager Photovoltaic Single Axis Tracker – Independent Assessment – 2019 |
• | Bloomberg New Energy Finance (“BNEF”) – 2020 New Energy Outlook (“NEO”) |
• | BNEF – 2H 2020 LCOE Update |
• | BNEF – Capacity Forecast Update |
• | Eclipse-M – FTC Solar Voyager Single-Axis Tracker Market Annual 2020 Update: Comparison Report |
• | IHS Markit Ltd (“IHS Markit”) – Global PV Tracker Market Report: 2020 |
• | IHS Markit – PV Installations Tracker |
• | International Renewable Energy Agency (“IRENA”) – Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019 |
• | InfoLink Consulting Co., Ltd. (“PV InfoLink”) – The New Era of PV: 600W+ Modules |
• | Solar Energy Industries Association (“SEIA”) – Solar Industry Research Data |
• | United States Energy Information Administration – United States Electricity Profile 2019 |
• | United States Environmental Protection Agency – Air Pollutant Emissions Trends Data |
• | United States Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (“SIF”) – Report on U.S. Sustainable and Impact Investing Trends 2020 |
• | United States National Renewable Energy Laboratory (“NREL”) – Understanding Bifacial Photovoltaics Potential: Field Performance – December 2019 |
• | Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables (“Wood Mackenzie”) – The Global PV Tracker Landscape 2019 |
• | Wood Mackenzie – Global Bifacial Module Market Report 2019 |
• | Wood Mackenzie – Global Solar PV Market Outlook Update – Q3 2020 |
• | Wood Mackenzie – H2 2020 U.S. Solar PV System Pricing |
• | Wood Mackenzie – The Global Solar PV Tracker Landscape 2020 |
• | Industry-Leading Installation Speed and Low Labor Costs. Voyager requires up to 56% fewer foundations per MW than other competing solutions, or only seven structural foundations, or piles, per row. This results in 15% less steel content in projects using our system. Voyager also utilizes (i) simplified assembly methods that require fewer tools and up to 45% fewer connection points between piles than competing solutions and (ii) our patented panel hanging and self-alignment features, which together result in industry-leading installation speeds. In a study we commissioned in 2020, Eclipse-M, a nationally-recognized construction management consultant, found that Voyager’s installation time is 41% less than the industry average, or 211 person-hours per MW compared to 355 person-hours per MW for the trackers of our leading competitors that were evaluated in the study. In the United States, Australia and parts of Europe, we estimate that this reduced installation time, together with EPC contractors’ savings on materials due to our design methodologies (which are applicable to all sales markets), can result in 1.5-2.0 cents per watt of cost savings as compared to industry-leading one-panel in-portrait and two-panel in-portrait competitors. As such, on a 50 MW system in the United States, this could represent up to $1 million of project savings. In 2020, we reduced the installation time of our products by 32% from 2019 and we believe there is an opportunity to further reduce our customers' average installation cost through additional product innovation and installation technique improvements. Faster installation times are an increasingly impactful competitive advantage, as labor is a significant and growing contributor to total solar energy project costs, increasing from 22% in 2015 to 35% for standard 10 MW tracker projects in 2020 (over this same period, equipment costs have decreased from representing 66% to 51% of total costs of these projects), according to a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. While independent row trackers are typically more expensive due to the higher-technology equipment required for their operation, we believe our independent row design offsets these higher fixed costs with lower installation cost and increased energy production. |
• | Design Flexibility that Optimizes Solar Panel Density. Voyager has a typical row length of 60 meters, compared to the significantly longer row lengths of some of our competitors’ systems, providing relative site design flexibility. Additionally, the two-panel in-portrait design of Voyager provides twice the number of solar panels across a given length of row compared to one-panel in-portrait systems. This increased panel density allows for greater design flexibility on sites with irregular boundaries, maximizes the use of available land and helps to preserve site environment. We believe these features, combined with the slope and terrain flexibility of Voyager, will be increasingly advantageous moving forward as an increasing percentage of solar projects are developed on sites with irregular boundaries and undulating terrain. Additionally, two-panel in-portrait systems capture more diffuse light due to their increased height as compared to one-panel in-portrait systems, and have higher panel performance from the reduced impact of radiant ground heat. |
• | Slope and Terrain Flexibility. Our independent row design allows for simplified installation on undulating terrain and irregular site boundaries. With no connection point between sequential rows, unlike linked-row systems, each Voyager row can be positioned without consideration of adjacent rows, enabling optimized row configuration. Additionally, Voyager’s adjustable design mounting allows for installation on terrain with slopes of up to 17.5% grade. This deployment flexibility allows Voyager to maximize solar energy production on sloped terrain while avoiding high grading costs, and our customers have the opportunity to enhance such benefits through the use of our SunPath tracking algorithm that reduces row-to-row shading. |
• | Structural Design that Optimizes Bifacial Panel Yield. Bifacial panels collect solar energy from both sides of the solar panel, resulting in up to a 9% gain in energy production compared with monofacial panels, according to an ongoing study by NREL. This efficiency improvement over traditional solar panels is driving a significant market shift to the use of bifacial panels, with bifacial panels expected to account for 17% of total installed solar capacity by 2024, quadrupling its share in 2019, according to a 2019 Wood Mackenzie report. We believe Voyager improves bifacial panel yield as compared to one-panel in-portrait systems by approximately 2% due to its structural design that minimizes rear side shading, increases rear side irradiance and improves thermal performance. |
• | DC Collections Advantages. In utility-scale solar projects, individual solar panels are wired in series into strings of solar panels, which typically consist of approximately 30 individual solar panels per string. Voyager can support four strings of panels per row versus the more common single-axis structure that only supports three strings of panels per row. This four string architecture allows for approximately 25% less direct current (“DC”) cabling to collect the power from each row, which we believe results in cost savings on materials and labor. In addition, the symmetric four string Voyager architecture, which isolates strings of panels into four quadrants on the tracker row, allows projects using Voyager to observe significantly less mismatch loss for bifacial panels compared to projects using (i) one-panel in-portrait single-axis trackers or (ii) two-panel in-portrait three string trackers that cannot isolate strings of panels onto a single side of the tracker. We believe Voyager’s reduction in mismatch loss for bifacial panels provides a significant energy production advantage compared to other trackers. |
• | Site Accessibility. Our two-panel in-portrait architecture maximizes row spacing and allows improved site access for operations and maintenance of the solar energy project or the grounds on which the project is sited. For an equivalent panel density or ground coverage ratio, Voyager provides twice the spacing between rows compared to one-panel in-portrait systems. This increased, open row spacing allows for vehicle access even in the most dense system layouts. Additionally, unlike linked-row systems, our design has no physical barriers that prevent movement between rows, such as movement undertaken during routine ground maintenance, which is important to maintain energy yields from the rear facing panel of bifacial solar panels. |
• | Performance-Enhancing Software Solution. Voyager uses a motor and slew drive on each row to continuously align the solar panels to the sun through the use of our baseline, proprietary solar tracking algorithm. Our customers also have the option to license our premium performance-enhancing software solution, SunPath, that uses proprietary algorithms that take into consideration topography, meteorological conditions and other local site conditions to reduce shading on every row and adjust panel positioning to address diffused light conditions (e.g. cloud cover), which results in optimized tracking and solar energy generation. Our SunPath software solution was released in the fourth quarter of 2020 and is backward compatible with all previously installed Voyager systems. |
• | Cost Competitiveness with Fossil-Fuel Energy Generation. Solar energy is currently one of the cheapest sources of new-build power generation, on an LCOE basis, in countries that account for approximately two-thirds of the global population and is forecasted to continue decreasing in cost to become the cheapest form of wholesale electric generation in the United States by 2022, according to BNEF. |
• | Governmental Policies and Regulations Across the Globe Supporting Renewable Energy. Governments across the globe have established policies to support a transition away from fossil fuels and towards low-carbon forms of energy, such as solar power. In the United States, for example, 30 states and the District of Columbia have implemented Renewable Portfolio Standards (“RPS”), which require a specified percentage of the electricity sold by utilities to come from renewable resources by a certain date. Global renewable energy support has accelerated since the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which became effective in 2016. |
• | Corporate Procurement of Renewable Energy. Companies across a variety of industries have become increasingly focused on the climate impact of their operations. For example, over 1,000 companies around the world have committed to or already set science-based greenhouse gas emissions targets in accordance with the goals of the Paris Agreement, according to The Science Based Targets initiative. Since fossil fuel-based energy generation is one of the main sources of corporate greenhouse gas emissions, shifting to renewable energy is a primary way for companies to reduce their carbon emissions and achieve such targets. |
• | Improvement in Battery Storage Technology. Recent advances in technology and cost reductions have helped battery storage emerge as a solution to the intermittent nature of solar power. The cumulative installed capacity of energy storage projects is expected to increase from 11 GW in 2020 to 168 GW in 2030, according to BNEF NEO. The ability of battery technology to convert solar energy to a baseload form of power is expected to establish solar energy as a firm, reliable source of power, increasing overall demand for solar energy. |
• | Continued Development of Newly-Renewable Use Cases. The increased cost competitiveness of electricity is driving new sectors of the economy to switch from fossil fuels to electricity as their source of energy, such as passenger and commercial vehicles, and heating and industrial processes. |
• | Increased Capital Available for Green Investments. Environmental responsibility has become a priority for investors, demonstrated by a meaningful trend in allocation of capital to companies that are leading and committed to the energy transition from fossil fuels to low-carbon alternatives. |
• | Market and Product Positioning. In designing Voyager, we sought to introduce a solution that is differentiated from existing industry solutions and positioned to address the future needs of the solar industry as it continues to develop. In addition to benefitting from the growth in solar energy and the increasing penetration of trackers, we believe we are positioned to benefit from the accelerating adoption of two-panel in-portrait tracker systems, bifacial panels and larger-format or higher-powered bifacial panels. Our two-panel in-portrait solutions are already optimized for bifacial panels. In 2020, we introduced our first Voyager solution designed for the new larger-format panels entering the marketplace and were awarded one of the world’s first larger-format panel projects. |
• | Management Team with Extensive Renewable Energy Industry Experience. Our management team has global experience across the full solar energy project lifecycle, including project development, finance, equipment supply, construction and operations. Since 2013, our management team has spearheaded the design and delivery of more than 2.7 GW of single-axis tracker equipment, attributable to both the AP90 tracker (and its predecessor product) and Voyager. Our management team’s experience beyond these products includes the development, financing and construction of more than 5.5 GW of utility-scale solar energy projects. |
• | Multi-Region, Asset-Light Contract Manufacturing Model. Voyager is manufactured through proven and certified contract manufacturing partners. This allows us to scale to meet growing customer demand without intensive capital investment, leading to strong cash flow conversion, all while ensuring the high quality of our products. Our contract manufacturing partners are subject to a rigorous qualification process, which includes third party audits and production monitoring. Our global supply chain allows us to optimize logistics and lead times for both domestic and international growth. This provides geographic diversity which reduces the impact of trade tariffs and enables the reliable supply of our product. |
• | Focus on Product Improvement and Technology Innovation. Voyager offers proprietary architecture advances that lower installation cost and improve operational performance. These innovations help us deliver additional value to our customers and improve our competitive positioning. Additionally, we leverage innovative forecasting and modeling platforms and methods to optimize project yield. |
• | Flexible Capital Structure. We have been able to grow our company without the use of long-term debt as a result of our asset-light contract manufacturing model and by leveraging operating efficiencies. Because we have prudently operated our business since our inception, we have significant capital structure flexibility with which to fund our future growth at an attractive cost of capital. We ended 2020 with a positive net cash position and no long-term debt. |
• | Engineering Services Offerings. Voyager is augmented by our engineering services offerings that assist customers in optimizing our product and reducing total project costs. The engineering services we offer include power plant design services for array layout and electrical design as well as structural and foundation design, and construction engineering consulting services focused on improving productivity and |
• | Value-Added Project Management Software. In addition to SunPath, our software that is designed to increase energy production from Voyager, we offer two other software solutions to support our customers in project design and development, Atlas and SunDAT. These project management software solutions can be coupled with Voyager, but can also be utilized by non-Voyager customers. Our software licensing model also provides additional opportunities for engagement and service, which strengthen customer relationships. |
• | Increasing Our Market Share in the United States. From the first installation of Voyager in the third quarter of 2019, we have quickly built a strong track record of innovative design, construction efficiency and customer engagement. As of December 31, 2020, we had an estimated U.S. tracker market share of approximately 11%, which was calculated using our MW shipped for fiscal year 2020 compared to a total tracker market shipment estimate from a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. We plan to leverage Voyager’s strong value proposition to transition from predominantly contracts for sales for single projects to a mix of such single project sales and contracts for sales for multiple projects with project developers, solar asset owners and EPC contractors. |
• | Expanding Internationally. We believe there is a significant opportunity for us to penetrate additional markets outside of the United States. International markets are experiencing the same benefits from, and trend towards adoption of, trackers as seen in the United States, and represent further upside potential, as these markets have lower tracker penetration today. Cumulative installed capacity outside of the United States is expected to reach approximately 1.7 TW in 2025, up from 775 GW in 2019, according to BNEF NEO. In 2020, we established sales and marketing operations in Asia, the Middle East, North Africa and Australia, and we expect to continue to expand our global footprint in 2021 by establishing similar operations in Latin America and Europe. In addition to our strong product offerings, we believe our growing track record and strong customer relationships will aid our international expansion efforts. |
• | Enhancing Our Product Capability. We believe that Voyager is well-positioned to continue to adapt to evolving changes in panel technology because it has been engineered to be panel agnostic and designed to be flexible to form. We are intensely focused on continuing to enhance our product performance and positioning. Our initial version of Voyager was marketed for inclusion in projects in regions with maximum wind speeds of 105 mph. Throughout 2020, we have released and contracted to sell two additional versions of Voyager that are marketed for inclusion in projects in regions with maximum wind speeds of both 120 mph and 135 mph, according to a 2019 Black & Veatch report. In addition, panel manufacturers continue to advance the efficiency of solar panels through design and manufacturing changes, including, in particular, in the form of bifacial panels and larger-format panels. In 2020, we released Voyager+, our next generation single-axis Voyager Tracker, which is compatible with larger-format panels from a variety of solar panel manufacturers and we were awarded one of the world’s first larger-format panel projects. |
• | Reducing Operating Costs through Operating Leverage. We believe that the scaling of our workforce in 2020, combined with our focus on lower-cost employees and lower-cost regions in the future, such as Asia, provides us with operating efficiencies that will enable us to enhance our profitability as we grow. We have historically prioritized establishing operations in the United States to support the growth we have achieved to date. We expect a significant portion of our incremental headcount additions moving forward to be lower-cost employees to support increased sales (such as field service employees), and expect future growth in sales employees to be focused on lower-cost regions. |
• | Capturing Additional Revenue Streams through Software Services. We believe that our add-on SunPath software, with performance-enhancing algorithms, has the potential to provide significant |
• | Developing Additional Tracker Services. We believe we have additional opportunities to differentiate ourselves as a solar energy solutions provider to our customers through the introduction of a targeted set of offerings beyond sales of Voyager. We have the ability to introduce hardware and software upgrades and retrofits as well as preventative maintenance services and extended warranty plans, each of which we believe can generate high margin, recurring revenue that also strengthens customer relationships. |
• | Growing through Strategic Acquisitions. We believe that our strong balance sheet affords us the opportunity to access the capital markets on favorable terms, which in turn gives us the option to accelerate our growth through strategic acquisitions. We continue to investigate opportunities to further diversify our platform through strategic acquisitions. |
• | our limited operating history and the rapidly changing solar industry make it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects and we may not achieve profitability in the future; |
• | we have a history of losses that may continue in the future, and we may not achieve profitability; |
• | the market for our products and services is highly competitive and rapidly evolving and we expect to face increased competition; |
• | if potential owners of solar energy systems incorporating our solar tracker systems are unable to secure financing on acceptable terms, we could experience a reduction in the demand for our products; |
• | our dependence on a limited number of customers may impair our ability to operate profitably; |
• | we invest significant time, resources and management attention to identifying and developing project leads that are subject to our sales and marketing focus and if we are unsuccessful in converting such project leads (or awarded orders) into binding purchase orders, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected; |
• | we plan to expand into additional international markets, which will expose us to additional regulatory, economic, political, reputational and competitive risks; |
• | we may acquire other companies or technologies, which could divert our management’s attention, result in dilution to our stockholders, reduce our available cash that could be used for other purposes and otherwise disrupt our operations and harm our results of operations; |
• | defects or quality or performance problems in our products could result in loss of customers, reputational damage and decreased revenue, and we may face warranty, indemnity and product liability claims arising from defective products; |
• | we face risks related to actual or threatened health epidemics, such as the novel coronavirus |
• | if we fail, in whole or in part, to obtain, maintain, protect, defend or enforce our intellectual property and other proprietary rights, our business and results of operations could be materially harmed; |
• | we depend upon a limited number of outside contract manufacturers, and our operations could be disrupted if our relationships with these contract manufacturers are compromised; |
• | we may experience delays, disruptions or quality control problems in our contract manufacturers’ manufacturing operations, which could result in reputational damage and other liabilities to our customers; |
• | failure by our contract manufacturers to use ethical business practices and comply with applicable laws and regulations may adversely affect our business; |
• | in certain circumstances, our contract manufacturers are dependent on ocean transportation to deliver our products. If our contract manufacturers experience disruptions in the use of ocean transportation, which includes vessels, ports and related infrastructure and logistics, to deliver our products, our business and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted; |
• | the reduction, elimination or expiration of government incentives for, or regulations mandating the use of, as well as corporate commitments to the use of, renewable energy and solar energy specifically could reduce demand for solar energy systems and harm our business; |
• | changes in the U.S. trade environment, including the imposition of import tariffs, could adversely affect the amount or timing of our revenue, results of operations or cash flows; and |
• | we could be adversely affected by any violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”), and other foreign anti-bribery laws, as well as of export controls and economic sanctions laws. |
• | we are permitted to include only two years of audited financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure; |
• | we are not required to engage an auditor to report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; |
• | we are permitted to take advantage of extended transition periods for complying with new or revised accounting standards which allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of some accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies; |
• | we are not required to submit certain executive compensation matters to stockholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay,” “say-on-frequency” and “say-on-golden parachutes;” and |
• | we are not required to comply with certain disclosure requirements related to executive compensation, such as the requirement to disclose the correlation between executive compensation and performance and the requirement to present a comparison of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to our median employee compensation. |
• | $181.0 million for general corporate purposes, including working capital and operating expenses. We may also use a portion of such proceeds to acquire or invest in businesses, products, services or technologies, however, we do not have binding agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions or investments at this time. |
• | $140.3 million to purchase an aggregate of 7,894,735 shares of our common stock (or $189.3 million to purchase 10,657,892 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), some of which will result from the settlement of certain vested RSUs and the exercise of certain options in connection with this offering, from the Stock Repurchase Parties at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. |
• | 12,324,533 shares of common stock reserved for future grant or issuance under our 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) and 1,643,271 shares of common stock reserved for future grant or issuance under our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which shares will automatically increase each year, as more fully described in “Executive and Director Compensation;” |
• | 8,236,363 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding as of March 31, 2021, having a weighted-average exercise price of $0.23 per share (with 5,802,779 of such options being vested as of March 31, 2021); |
• | 15,462,270 shares of common stock issuable upon settlement of RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2021, having an estimated grant date fair value of $7.15 per share (with 10,915,938 of such RSUs being vested as of March 31, 2021); and |
• | 32,466 shares of our common stock that we intend to repurchase and retire pursuant to the Stock Repurchase resulting from the exercise of certain options and 4,192,896 shares of our common stock that we intend to repurchase and retire pursuant to the Stock Repurchase resulting from the settlement of certain vested RSUs in connection with this offering. |
• | a 8.25-for-1 stock split to be effected prior to the closing of this offering (the “Forward Stock Split”); |
• | no exercise, settlement or termination of outstanding options or RSUs after March 31, 2021, except in connection with the settlement of certain vested RSUs and the exercise of certain options for the Stock Repurchase; |
• | the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation in Delaware and the adoption of our amended and restated bylaws immediately prior to the closing of this offering; |
• | an initial public offering price of $19.00 per share of common stock, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus; and |
• | no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase additional shares of our common stock. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product revenue | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 |
Service revenue | | | 10,039 | | | 28,427 |
Total revenue | | | 53,124 | | | 187,352 |
Cost of revenue(1): | | | | | ||
Product cost of revenue | | | 44,212 | | | 155,967 |
Service cost of revenue | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 55,075 | | | 183,713 |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development(1) | | | 3,960 | | | 5,222 |
Selling and marketing(1) | | | 1,897 | | | 3,545 |
General and administrative(1) | | | 4,563 | | | 11,798 |
Total operating expenses | | | 10,420 | | | 20,565 |
Loss from operations | | | (12,371) | | | (16,926) |
Interest expense, net | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Loss before income taxes | | | (12,825) | | | (17,406) |
Benefit from income taxes | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
| | | | |||
Net loss per share | | | | | ||
Basic and diluted | | | (1.79) | | | (1.91) |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | | | | | ||
Basic and diluted | | | 7,523,447 | | | 8,344,039 |
Pro forma net loss per share information (unaudited)(2) | | | | | ||
Pro forma net loss | | | | | (51,280) | |
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share | | | | | (0.70) | |
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted | | | | | 73,564,070 |
(1) | Costs and expenses include stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Cost of revenue | | | $ 176 | | | $322 |
General and administrative | | | 653 | | | 1,401 |
Research and development | | | 51 | | | 57 |
Selling and marketing | | | 26 | | | 38 |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | $ 906 | | | $1,818 |
(2) | Pro forma basic net loss per share is computed using pro forma net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, the effect of assumed vesting of the RSUs with service condition satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and the effect of the Forward Stock Split. Pro forma diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares, the effect of assumed vesting of the RSUs with service condition satisfied, the effect of potentially dilutive equity awards outstanding during the period and the effect of the Forward Stock Split. There were no potentially dilutive equity securities in the period presented. |
| | As of December 31, 2020 | |||||||
| | Actual | | | Pro Forma(1) | | | Pro Forma as Adjusted(2)(3) | |
| | (in thousands) | |||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | |||
Cash and restricted cash | | | $33,373 | | | $33,373 | | | $215,589 |
Total assets | | | 71,393 | | | 71,393 | | | 252,019 |
Total liabilities | | | 63,942 | | | 63,942 | | | 63,492 |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | 7,451 | | | 7,451 | | | 188,527 |
(1) | The pro forma consolidated balance sheet data gives effect to (i) the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and (ii) an increase to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit related to stock-based compensation expense of $35.4 million associated with RSUs for which the service-based vesting condition was satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and for which the liquidity event-related performance vesting condition will be satisfied in connection with this offering. |
(2) | The pro forma as adjusted column in the balance sheet data table above gives effect to (i) the pro forma adjustments set forth above, (ii) the sale and issuance by us of shares of our common stock in this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $19.00 per share, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (iii) the Stock Repurchase. |
(3) | Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $19.00 per share, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would have no impact on our pro forma as adjusted cash and restricted cash, total assets, total liabilities and total stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a result of the Stock Repurchase, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us. An increase or decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us would have no impact on the amount of our pro forma as adjusted cash and restricted cash, total assets, total liabilities, and total stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a result of the Stock Repurchase, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Non-GAAP Measures(1) | | | | | ||
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
Adjusted Net Loss | | | $(11,477) | | | $(15,475) |
Adjusted EPS | | | $(1.53) | | | $(1.86) |
(1) | We present Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS as supplemental measures of our performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss plus (i) income tax benefit, (ii) interest expense, (iii) depreciation expense, (iv) amortization of intangibles, (v) stock-based compensation and (vi) loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary. We define Adjusted Net Loss as net loss plus (i) amortization of intangibles, (ii) stock-based compensation, (iii) loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary and (iv) income tax benefit of adjustments. Adjusted EPS is defined as Adjusted Net Loss on a per share basis using the weighted average diluted shares outstanding and excluding the effect of the Forward Stock Split. |
Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS are intended as supplemental measures of performance that are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. We present Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS because we believe they assist investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on an ongoing basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies. |
Among other limitations, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS do not reflect (i) our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, and (ii) the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations. Further, the adjustments noted in Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact of any income tax expense or benefit. Additionally, other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS differently than we do, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and you should not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. These non-GAAP financial measures, when presented, are reconciled to the most closely applicable GAAP measure as disclosed below. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
Income tax benefit | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Interest expense, net(a) | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Depreciation expense | | | 12 | | | 13 |
Amortization of intangibles(b) | | | 400 | | | 33 |
Stock-based compensation(c) | | | 906 | | | 1,818 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary(d) | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
(a) | Represents interest expense, annual amortization of debt issuance cost and loss on debt extinguishment in connection with our Secured Promissory Notes (as defined herein), and a revolving line of credit with Western Alliance Bank. See “Non-Operating Expenses and Other Items—Interest Expense” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” |
(b) | Represents amortization expense related to developed technology. |
(c) | Represents stock-based compensation expense. See “Executive and Director Compensation.” |
(d) | Represents results of an entity that we do not consolidate, as our management excludes these results when evaluating our operating performance. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |||||||
| | Loss | | | EPS | | | Loss | | | EPS | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Net loss and EPS | | | $(13,495) | | | (1.79) | | | $(15,924) | | | (1.91) |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 400 | | | 0.05 | | | 33 | | | — |
Stock-based compensation | | | 906 | | | 0.12 | | | 1,818 | | | 0.22 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | 0.09 | | | (1,399) | | | (0.17) |
Income tax expense of adjustments(a) | | | 3 | | | — | | | (3) | | | — |
Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS | | | $(11,477) | | | (1.53) | | | $(15,475) | | | (1.86) |
Adjusted effective tax rate(b) | | | 0.36% | | | | | 0.50% | | |
(a) | Represents incremental tax expense of adjustments assuming the adjusted effective tax rate. |
(b) | Represents the adjusted effective tax rate for the periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the effective tax rate of 0.29% was increased by 0.07% to 0.36% and for the year ended December 31, 2020, the effective tax rate of 0.36% was increased by 0.14% to 0.50%. The increases were due to the impact of adjustments made for loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary. |
• | the cost competitiveness, reliability and performance of solar energy systems compared to conventional and non-solar renewable energy sources and products; |
• | the availability, scale and scope of federal, state, local and foreign government subsidies and incentives to support the development and deployment of solar energy products; |
• | prices of traditional carbon-based energy sources and government subsidies for these sources; |
• | the extent to which the electric power industry and broader energy industries are deregulated to permit broader adoption of solar electricity generation; |
• | investment by end-users of solar energy products, which tends to decrease when economic growth slows; and |
• | the emergence, continuance or success of, or increased government support for, other alternative energy generation technologies and products. |
• | our ability to produce solar tracker systems that compete favorably against other products on the basis of price, quality, cost of installation, overall cost savings, reliability and performance; |
• | the rate and extent of deployment of tracker systems versus fixed-tilt ground-mounted systems within the solar industry, especially in international markets; |
• | the rate and extent of deployment of two-panel in-portrait tracker systems versus one-panel in-portrait tracker systems; |
• | our ability to timely introduce new products and complete new designs, and qualify and certify our products; |
• | whether project developers, solar asset owners, EPC contractors and solar financing providers will continue to adopt and finance our solar tracker systems and other products and services, including as a result of the quality, reliability and performance of our tracker systems that are in operation, which have a relatively limited history; |
• | the ability of prospective customers to obtain financing, including tax equity financing, for solar energy installations using our products on acceptable terms or at all; |
• | our ability to develop products and related processes that comply with local standards and regulatory requirements, as well as local content requirements; and |
• | our ability to develop and maintain successful relationships with our customers and contract manufacturers. |
• | construction of a significant number of new, lower-cost power generation plants, including plants utilizing natural gas, renewable energy or other generation technologies; |
• | relief of transmission constraints that enable distant, lower-cost generation to transmit energy less expensively or in greater quantities; |
• | reductions in the price of natural gas or other fuels; |
• | utility rate adjustment and customer class cost reallocation; |
• | decreased electricity demand, including from energy conservation technologies and public initiatives to reduce electricity consumption; |
• | development of smart-grid technologies that lower peak energy requirements; |
• | development of new or lower-cost customer-sited energy storage technologies that have the ability to reduce a customer’s average cost of electricity by shifting load to off-peak times; and |
• | development of new energy generation technologies that provide less expensive energy. |
• | difficulty in establishing and managing international operations, including establishment of local customer service operations and local sales operations, and the associated legal compliance costs; |
• | risks related to the usage of international sales representatives, who are not our employees and not under our direct control, including legal compliance risks and reputational risks; |
• | acceptance of our single-axis tracker systems or other solar energy products and services in markets in which they have not traditionally been used; |
• | our ability to accurately forecast product demand and manage manufacturing capacity and production; |
• | willingness of our potential customers to incur a higher upfront capital investment for Voyager than may be required for competing fixed-tilt ground-mounted systems; |
• | our ability to reduce production costs to price our products competitively; |
• | availability of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar energy products and services; |
• | timely qualification and certification of new products; |
• | the ability to protect and enforce intellectual property rights abroad; |
• | compliance with sanctions laws and anti-bribery laws, such as the FCPA, by us, our employees, our sales representatives and our business partners; |
• | import and export controls and restrictions and changes in trade regulations; |
• | tariffs and other non-tariff barriers, tax consequences and local content requirements; |
• | fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the requirements of currency control regulations, which might restrict or prohibit conversion of other currencies into U.S. dollars; and |
• | political or social unrest or economic instability in a specific country or region in which we operate. |
• | diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to addressing acquisition integration challenges; |
• | retention of key employees from the acquired company; |
• | failure to realize long-term value and synergies from the acquisition; |
• | failure to realize incremental revenue that was anticipated to result from the acquisition; |
• | synchronization and integration of the operations of the acquired company with our operations, including blending of corporate cultures; |
• | assumption of liabilities for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition; and |
• | litigation or other claims in connection with the acquisition, including claims from terminated employees, customers, former stockholders or other third parties. |
• | the imposition of additional trade laws, regulations, duties, tariffs and other charges on imports and exports that could relate to imports from a number of different countries, including as a result of the escalating trade war between China and the United States; |
• | the potential imposition of restrictions on our acquisition, importation or installation of equipment under future U.S. regulations implementing the Executive Order on Securing the United States Bulk-Power System; |
• | quotas imposed by bilateral trade agreements; |
• | foreign currency fluctuations; |
• | public health issues and epidemic diseases, their effects (including any disruptions they may cause) or the perception of their effects, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; and |
• | significant labor disputes, such as transportation worker strikes. |
• | changes in laws or regulations applicable to our industry or offerings; |
• | speculation about our business in the press or investment community; |
• | price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market; |
• | volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies in our industry or companies that investors consider comparable; |
• | share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading levels of our common stock; |
• | our ability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights and to avoid infringement, misappropriation or violation of the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties or claims by third parties of such infringement, misappropriation or violation; |
• | sales of our common stock by us or our principal stockholders, officers and directors; |
• | the expiration of contractual lock-up agreements; |
• | the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock; |
• | success of competitive products or services; |
• | the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or others, including our filings with the SEC, announcements relating to litigation or significant changes in our key personnel; |
• | the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting; |
• | changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of debt or equity securities; |
• | our entry into new markets; |
• | tax developments in the U.S. or other markets; |
• | strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; and |
• | changes in accounting principles. |
• | a staggered board, which means that our board of directors is classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms; |
• | limitations on convening special stockholder meetings, which could make it difficult for our stockholders to adopt desired governance changes; |
• | advance notice procedures, which apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders; |
• | a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which means that our stockholders will only be able to take action at a meeting of stockholders; |
• | a forum selection clause, which means certain litigation against us can only be brought in Delaware; |
• | no authorization of cumulative voting, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates; |
• | directors will only be able to be removed for cause; |
• | certain amendments to our certificate of incorporation will require the approval of two-thirds of the then outstanding voting power of our capital stock; |
• | our bylaws will provide that the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then outstanding voting power of our capital stock, voting as a single class, is required for stockholders to amend or adopt any provision of our bylaws; and |
• | the authorization of undesignated or “blank check” preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without further action by our stockholders. |
• | We did not have a sufficient complement of experienced personnel with the requisite technical knowledge of public company accounting and reporting and for non-routine, unusual or complex transactions. This material weakness contributed to the following material weakness. |
• | We did not design and maintain adequate controls over the period-end close and financial reporting process including establishment of accounting policies and procedures, certain account reconciliations, cut-off, segregation of duties, journal entries and financial statement preparation. This material weakness contributed to material adjustments in the 2019 consolidated financial statements principally, but not limited to, the following areas: definite-lived intangibles, warranty obligation, cut-off of revenue transactions and related cost of sales. |
• | We did not design and maintain effective information technology general controls over the IT systems used for preparation of the financial statements. Specifically, we did not design and maintain (i) program change management controls to ensure that information technology program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately; (ii) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and that adequately restrict user and privileged access to financial applications, programs and data to appropriate Company personnel; and (iii) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements. |
• | $181.0 million for general corporate purposes, including working capital and operating expenses. We may also use a portion of such proceeds to acquire or invest in businesses, products, services or technologies, however, we do not have binding agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions or investments at this time. |
• | $140.3 million to purchase an aggregate of 7,894,735 shares of our common stock (or $189.3 million to purchase 10,657,892 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), some of which will result from the settlement of certain vested RSUs and the exercise of certain options in connection with this offering, from the Stock Repurchase Parties at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. |
• | on an actual basis; |
• | on a pro forma basis to give effect to (i) the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation in Delaware immediately prior to the closing of this offering, (ii) an increase to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit related to stock-based compensation expense of $35.4 million associated with the RSUs for which the service-based vesting condition was satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and for which the liquidity event-related performance vesting condition will be satisfied in connection with this offering, in each case as if such event had occurred on December 31, 2020 and (iii) the Forward Stock Split; and |
• | on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to the adjustments described in the preceding clause and to reflect (i) the issuance and sale of 18,421,053 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $19.00 per share of common stock, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (ii) the Stock Repurchase. |
| | As of December 31, 2020 | |||||||
| | Actual | | | Pro Forma | | | Pro Forma As Adjusted | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Cash and restricted cash | | | $33,373 | | | $33,373 | | | $215,589 |
Debt: | | | | | | | |||
Line of credit | | | $1,000 | | | $1,000 | | | $1,000 |
Paycheck Protection Program loan | | | 784 | | | 784 | | | 784 |
Total debt | | | 1,784 | | | 1,784 | | | 1,784 |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | | | | |||
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share: 12,000,000 shares authorized, 8,022,066 shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis, 98,960,060 shares authorized, 66,155,328 shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis, 98,960,060 shares authorized, 80,907,007 shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma as adjusted basis | | | 1 | | | 7 | | | 9 |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 50,096 | | | 85,446 | | | 266,520 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (3) | | | (3) | | | (3) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (42,643) | | | (77,999) | | | (77,999) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | 7,451 | | | 7,451 | | | 188,527 |
Total capitalization | | | $9,235 | | | $9,235 | | | $190,311 |
Assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock | | | | | $19.00 | |
Pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock as of December 31, 2020 | | | $0.11 | | | |
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock attributable to investors in this offering | | | $2.22 | | | |
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock after giving effect to this offering | | | | | 2.33 | |
Dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock to new investors in this offering | | | | | $16.67 |
| | Shares Purchased | | | Total Consideration | | | Average Price Per Share | |||||||
| | Number | | | Percent | | | Amount | | | Percent | | |||
Existing stockholders | | | 62,485,954 | | | 77% | | | $37,781 | | | 10% | | | $0.60 |
New investors | | | 18,421,053 | | | 23 | | | 350,000 | | | 90 | | | 19.00 |
Total | | | 80,907,007 | | | 100% | | | $387,781 | | | 100% | | | $4.79 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
Income tax benefit | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Interest expense, net(a) | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Depreciation expense | | | 12 | | | 13 |
Amortization of intangibles(b) | | | 400 | | | 33 |
Stock-based compensation(c) | | | 906 | | | 1,818 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary(d) | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
(a) | Represents interest expense, annual amortization of debt issuance cost and loss on debt extinguishment in connection with our Secured Promissory Notes, and a revolving line of credit with Western Alliance Bank. See “Non-Operating Expenses and Other Items—Interest Expense” below |
(b) | Represents amortization expense related to developed technology. |
(c) | Represents stock-based compensation expense. See “Executive and Director Compensation.” |
(d) | Represents results of an entity that we do not consolidate, as our management excludes these results when evaluating our operating performance. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |||||||
| | Loss | | | EPS | | | Loss | | | EPS | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Net loss and EPS | | | $(13,495) | | | (1.79) | | | $(15,924) | | | (1.91) |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 400 | | | 0.05 | | | 33 | | | — |
Stock-based compensation | | | 906 | | | 0.12 | | | 1,818 | | | 0.22 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | 0.09 | | | (1,399) | | | (0.17) |
Income tax expense of adjustments(a) | | | 3 | | | — | | | (3) | | | — |
Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS | | | $(11,477) | | | (1.53) | | | $(15,475) | | | (1.86) |
Adjusted effective tax rate(b) | | | 0.36% | | | | | 0.50% | | |
(a) | Represents incremental tax expense of adjustments assuming the adjusted effective tax rate. |
(b) | Represents the adjusted effective tax rate for the periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the effective tax increased by 0.07% to 0.36% and for the year ended December 31, 2020, the effective tax rate of 0.36% was increased by 0.14% to 0.50%. The increases were due to the impact of adjustments made for loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product revenue | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 |
Service revenue | | | 10,039 | | | 28,427 |
Total revenue | | | 53,124 | | | 187,352 |
Cost of Revenue | | | | | ||
Product cost of revenue | | | 44,212 | | | 155,967 |
Service cost of revenue | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 55,075 | | | 183,713 |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development(a) | | | 3,960 | | | 5,222 |
Selling and marketing(a) | | | 1,897 | | | 3,545 |
General and administrative(a) | | | 4,563 | | | 11,798 |
Total operating expenses | | | 10,420 | | | 20,565 |
Loss from operations | | | (12,371) | | | (16,926) |
Interest expense, net | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Loss before income taxes | | | (12,825) | | | (17,406) |
Benefit from income taxes | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
| | | | |||
Non-GAAP Measures | | | | | ||
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
Adjusted Net Loss | | | $(11,477) | | | $(15,475) |
Adjusted EPS | | | $(1.53) | | | $(1.86) |
(a) | Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Cost of revenue | | | $176 | | | $322 |
Research and development | | | 51 | | | 57 |
Selling and marketing | | | 26 | | | 38 |
General and administrative | | | 653 | | | 1,401 |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | $906 | | | $1,818 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (as a percentage of revenue) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product revenue | | | 81% | | | 85% |
Service revenue | | | 19 | | | 15 |
Total revenue | | | 100 | | | 100 |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | ||
Product cost of revenue | | | 83 | | | 83 |
Service cost of revenue | | | 21 | | | 15 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 104 | | | 98 |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (4) | | | 2 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development | | | 7 | | | 3 |
Selling and marketing | | | 4 | | | 2 |
General and administrative | | | 9 | | | 6 |
Total operating expenses | | | 20 | | | 11 |
Loss from operations | | | (24) | | | (9) |
Interest expense, net | | | 1 | | | — |
Loss before income taxes | | | (25) | | | (9) |
Benefit from income taxes | | | — | | | |
Loss (Gain) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 1 | | | (1) |
Net loss | | | (26)% | | | (8)% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Product revenue | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 | | | $115,840 | | | 269% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Service revenue | | | $10,039 | | | $28,427 | | | $18,388 | | | 183% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Product cost of revenue | | | $44,212 | | | $155,967 | | | $111,755 | | | 253% |
Service cost of revenue | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 | | | 16,883 | | | 155% |
Total cost of revenue | | | $55,075 | | | $183,713 | | | $128,638 | | | 234% |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 | | | 5,590 | | | 287% |
Gross margin | | | (4)% | | | 2% | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Research and development | | | $3,960 | | | $5,222 | | | $1,262 | | | 32% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Selling and marketing | | | $1,897 | | | $3,545 | | | $1,648 | | | 87% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
General and administrative | | | $4,563 | | | $11,798 | | | $7,235 | | | 159% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Interest expense, net | | | $454 | | | $480 | | | $26 | | | 6% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | $709 | | | $(1,399) | | | $(2,108) | | | (297)% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) | | | $(2,429) | | | 18% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | | | $(254) | | | $(511) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | | (18) | | | 1,868 |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 7,000 | | | 23,784 |
Effect on exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | | | — | | | (3) |
Increase in cash and restricted cash | | | $ 6,728 | | | $25,138 |
• | contemporaneous third party valuations of our common stock; |
• | the prices at which we or other holders sold our common stock to outside investors in arms-length transactions; |
• | our financial condition, results of operations and capital resources; |
• | the industry outlook; |
• | the fact that option and restricted stock awards involve rights in illiquid securities in a private company; |
• | the valuation of comparable companies; |
• | the lack of marketability of our common stock; |
• | the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale of our company given prevailing market conditions; |
• | the history and nature of our business, industry trends and competitive environment; and |
• | general economic outlook including economic growth, inflation, unemployment, interest rate environment and global economic trends. |
• | Cost Competitiveness with Fossil-Fuel Energy Generation. Solar energy is currently one of the cheapest sources of new-build power generation, on an LCOE basis, in countries that account for approximately two-thirds of the global population and is forecasted to continue decreasing in cost to become the cheapest form of wholesale electric generation in the United States by 2022, according to BNEF. Cost reductions have been driven by technological innovation and engineering advancements. For example, solar panel manufacturers have successfully developed higher capacity, more highly-efficient solar panels. Solar energy projects that utilize tracker technology are particularly cost competitive relative to fossil fuels. |
• | Governmental Policies and Regulations Across the Globe Supporting Renewable Energy. Governments across the globe have established policies to support a transition away from fossil fuels and towards low-carbon forms of energy, such as solar power. In the United States, for example, 30 states and the District of Columbia have implemented RPSs, which require a specified percentage of the electricity sold by utilities to come from renewable resources by a certain date. While some state targets are between 10% and 45%, 14 states have targets of 50% or greater, according to the U.S. National Conference of State Legislatures. The U.S. ITC program, a federal tax incentive that benefits solar projects, provides an additional layer of government support. The ITC’s 26% tax credit rate was extended for two years under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. Feed-in-tariffs, which pay owners of renewable energy systems a certain amount per unit of electricity they generate and provide to the grid, is a common form of incentive outside of the United States. Additionally, many countries globally have corporate income tax regulations that provide a preferential tax rate for income from investment in the production of renewable energy. Global renewable energy support has accelerated since the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which became effective in 2016. |
• | Corporate Procurement of Renewable Energy. Companies across a variety of industries have become increasingly focused on the climate impact of their operations and have sought ways to lower their carbon footprints. For example, over 1,000 companies around the world have committed to or already set science-based greenhouse gas emissions targets in accordance with the goals of the Paris Agreement, according to The Science Based Targets initiative. Over 300 of these companies have committed to setting targets to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, in accordance with the Paris Agreement’s most ambitious goals. Since fossil fuel-based energy generation is one of the main sources of corporate greenhouse gas emissions, shifting to renewable energy is a primary way for companies to reduce their carbon emissions and achieve such targets. For example, in September 2019, Amazon created The Climate Pledge, which includes a commitment to achieve net-zero carbon emissions across Amazon’s business by 2040 and a commitment to power Amazon’s operations with 100% renewable energy by 2025. |
• | Improvement in Battery Storage Technology. One challenge to even faster adoption of solar energy technology is that it is an intermittent power source, because solar power can only be generated during the hours of the day when sunlight is available. Recent advances in technology and cost reductions have helped battery storage emerge as a solution to the intermittent nature of solar power. The cumulative installed capacity of energy storage projects is expected to increase from 11 GW in 2020 to 168 GW in 2030, according to BNEF NEO. This growth is supported by declines in the prices of lithium-ion batteries, which have fallen by approximately 80% over the last five years, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. The ability of battery technology to convert solar energy to a baseload form of power is expected to establish solar energy as a firm, reliable source of power, increasing overall demand for solar energy. |
• | Continued Development of Newly-Renewable Use Cases. The increased cost competitiveness of electricity is driving new sectors of the economy to switch from fossil fuels to electricity as their source of energy, such as passenger and commercial vehicles, and heating and industrial processes. This is expected to lead to increased demand for electricity, which should benefit the solar energy industry as one of the lowest-cost sources of power production. The shift of new sectors toward solar energy is also expected to provide public health benefits, as pollutants, such as carbon dioxide, created from the use of fossil fuels, are reduced. The realization of these benefits should serve to accelerate the trend toward renewable energy sources, which should in turn increase the demand for solar energy. |
• | Increased Capital Available for Green Investments. Environmental responsibility has become a priority for investors, demonstrated by a meaningful trend in allocation of capital to companies that are leading and committed to the energy transition from fossil fuels to low-carbon alternatives. The growing emphasis on Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) principles is one example of the increase in investor commitment to sustainable business practices. In the United States, total assets under management that are allocated using sustainable investing strategies (including ESG screening) grew from $12.0 trillion at the start of 2018 to $17.1 trillion at the start of 2020, an increase of 42%, according to a 2020 SIF report. In January 2020, the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, announced in a letter to clients that it would place sustainability, particularly with respect to global warming, at the center of how it “manages risk, constructs portfolios, designs products, and engages with companies.” |
• | Axis Design and Row Design. Single-axis trackers rotate across one axis, while dual-axis trackers rotate across two axes. Dual-axis trackers, however, have a higher degree of mechanical complexity, making them more expensive and requiring more maintenance over their installed lifetime. |
• | Panel Size. Solar panel manufacturers have begun to produce larger solar cell arrangement, or wafer, sizes (with diameters of 182mm and 210mm in particular) as a result of technological advancements driving individual solar cell efficiency. These larger wafer sizes have resulted in the production of solar panels that are larger, heavier, higher wattage and lower cost. With a gain in energy production per panel of up to 30% in some instances due to the size increase, larger-format panels are expected to represent approximately 85% of the solar energy market by 2024, according to a 2020 PV InfoLink Report. |
• | Panel Configuration. The traditional one-panel in-portrait tracker design has one row of panels in portrait orientation, supported by a rotating axis in the middle of the row. The alternative two-panel in-portrait tracker design has two adjacent rows of panels in portrait orientation, supported by a rotating axis between the rows. With two panels in each row as opposed to one, two-panel in-portrait tracker designs provide increased panel density and have a larger overall surface area, capturing more sunlight. Additionally, two-panel in-portrait tracker systems capture more diffuse light due to their increased height and have higher panel performance from the reduced impact of radiant ground heat. The two-panel in-portrait tracker design has increased its market share in the tracker space in recent years, representing approximately 21% of total tracker shipments in 2019, according to a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. Between 2016 and 2019, we estimate that two-panel in-portrait installations grew three times faster than one-panel in-portrait installations, according to a combination of Wood Mackenzie data and our internal data. |
• | Industry-Leading Installation Speed and Low Labor Costs. Voyager requires up to 56% fewer foundations per MW than other competing solutions, or only seven structural foundations, or piles, per row. This results in 15% less steel content in projects using our system. Voyager also utilizes (i) simplified assembly methods that require fewer tools and up to 45% fewer connection points between piles than competing solutions and (ii) our patented panel hanging and self-alignment features, which together result in industry-leading installation speeds. In a study we commissioned in 2020, Eclipse-M, a nationally-recognized construction management consultant, found that Voyager’s installation time is 211 person-hours per MW, a reduction of 41% compared to the industry average of 355 person-hours per MW for the trackers of our leading competitors that were evaluated in the study. In the United States, Australia and parts of Europe, we estimate that this reduced installation time, together with EPC contractors’ savings on materials due to our design methodologies (which are applicable to all sales markets), can result in 1.5-2.0 cents per watt of cost savings as compared to industry-leading one-panel in-portrait and two-panel in-portrait competitors. As such, on a 50 MW system in the United States, this could represent up to $1 million of project savings. We intend to continue to improve on this competitive advantage by further reducing our installation times, as well as installation cost. For example, in 2020, we reduced the installation time of our products by 32% from 2019 and we believe there is an opportunity to further reduce our customers' average installation cost through additional product innovation and installation technique improvements. Faster installation times are an increasingly impactful competitive advantage, as labor is a significant and growing contributor to total solar energy project costs, increasing from 22% in 2015 to 35% for standard 10 MW tracker projects in 2020 (over this same period, equipment costs have decreased from representing 66% to 51% of total costs of these projects), according to a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. While independent row trackers are typically more expensive due to the higher-technology equipment required for their operation, we believe our independent row design offsets these higher fixed costs with lower installation cost and increased energy production. |
• | Design Flexibility that Optimizes Solar Panel Density. Voyager has a typical row length of 60 meters, compared to the significantly longer row lengths of some of our competitors’ systems, providing relative site design flexibility. Additionally, the two-panel in-portrait design of Voyager provides twice the number of solar panels across a given length of row compared to one-panel in-portrait systems. This increased panel density allows for greater design flexibility on sites with irregular boundaries, maximizes the use of available land and helps to preserve site environment. We believe these features, combined with the slope and terrain flexibility of Voyager, will be increasingly advantageous moving forward as an increasing percentage of solar projects are developed on sites with irregular boundaries and undulating terrain. Additionally, two-panel in-portrait systems capture more diffuse light due to their increased height as compared to one-panel in-portrait systems, and have higher panel performance from the reduced impact of radiant ground heat. |
• | Slope and Terrain Flexibility. Our independent row design allows for simplified installation on undulating terrain and irregular site boundaries. With no connection point between sequential rows, unlike linked-row systems, each Voyager row can be positioned without consideration of adjacent rows, enabling optimized row configuration. Additionally, Voyager’s adjustable design mounting allows for installation on terrain with slopes of up to 17.5% grade. This deployment flexibility allows Voyager to maximize solar energy production on sloped terrain while avoiding high grading costs, and our customers have the opportunity to enhance such benefits through the use of our SunPath tracking algorithm that reduces row-to-row shading. |
• | Structural Design that Optimizes Bifacial Panel Yield. Bifacial panels collect solar energy from both sides of the solar panel, resulting in up to a 9% gain in energy production compared with monofacial panels, according to an ongoing study by NREL. This efficiency improvement over traditional solar panels is driving a significant market shift to the use of bifacial panels, with bifacial panels expected to account for 17% of total installed solar capacity by 2024, quadrupling its share in 2019, according to a 2019 Wood Mackenzie report. We believe Voyager improves bifacial panel yield as compared to one-panel in-portrait systems by approximately 2% due to its structural design that minimizes rear side shading, increases rear side irradiance and improves thermal performance. |
• | DC Collections Advantages. In utility-scale solar projects, individual solar panels are wired in series into strings of solar panels, which typically consist of approximately 30 individual solar panels per string. Voyager can support four strings of panels per row versus the more common single-axis structure that only supports three strings of panels per row. This four string architecture allows for approximately 25% less DC cabling to collect the power from each row, which we believe results in cost savings on materials and labor. In addition, the symmetric four string Voyager architecture isolates strings of panels into four quadrants on the tracker row, with two strings of panels on the east side of the torque tube and two strings of panels on the west side of the torque tube. This symmetric four string architecture allows projects using Voyager to observe significantly less mismatch loss for bifacial panels compared to projects using (i) one-panel in-portrait single-axis trackers or (ii) two-panel in-portrait three string trackers that cannot isolate strings of panels onto a single side of the tracker. We believe Voyager’s reduction in mismatch loss for bifacial panels provides a significant energy production advantage compared to other trackers. |
• | Site Accessibility. Our two-panel in-portrait architecture maximizes row spacing and allows improved site access for operations and maintenance of the solar energy project or the grounds on which the project is sited. For an equivalent panel density or ground coverage ratio, Voyager provides twice the spacing between rows compared to one-panel in-portrait systems. This increased, open row spacing allows for vehicle access even in the most dense system layouts. Additionally, unlike linked-row systems, our design has no physical barriers that prevent movement between rows, such as movement undertaken during routine ground maintenance, which is important to maintain energy yields from the rear facing panel of bifacial solar panels. |
• | Performance-Enhancing Software Solution. Voyager uses a motor and slew drive on each row to continuously align the solar panels to the sun through the use of our baseline, proprietary solar tracking algorithm. Our customers also have the option to license our premium performance-enhancing software solution, SunPath, through either recurring payments or a single up-front payment. SunPath uses proprietary algorithms that take into consideration topography, meteorological conditions and other local site conditions to reduce shading on every row and adjust panel positioning to address diffused light conditions (e.g. cloud cover), which results in optimized tracking and solar energy generation. Depending on the dynamics of a specific site and the algorithms utilized, our internal simulations have demonstrated that the SunPath software solution can produce up to an additional 6% energy yield advantage over our base-model Voyager Trackers. Our SunPath software solution was released in the fourth quarter of 2020 and is backward compatible with all previously installed Voyager systems. |
• | Market and Product Positioning. In designing Voyager, we sought to introduce a solution that is differentiated from existing industry solutions and positioned to address the future needs of the solar industry as it continues to develop. In addition to benefitting from the growth in solar energy and the increasing penetration of trackers, we believe we are positioned to benefit from the accelerating adoption of two-panel in-portrait tracker systems, bifacial panels and larger-format or higher-powered bifacial panels. Our two-panel in-portrait solutions are already optimized for bifacial panels. In 2020, we introduced our first Voyager solution designed for the new larger-format panels entering the marketplace and were awarded one of the world’s first larger-format panel projects. |
• | Management Team with Extensive Renewable Energy Industry Experience. Our management team has global experience across the full solar energy project lifecycle, including project development, finance, equipment supply, construction and operations. Since 2013, our management team has spearheaded the design and delivery of more than 2.7 GW of single-axis tracker equipment, attributable to both the AP90 tracker (and its predecessor product) and Voyager. Our management team’s experience beyond these products includes the development, financing and construction of more than 5.5 GW of utility-scale solar energy projects. |
• | Multi-Region, Asset-Light Contract Manufacturing Model. Voyager is manufactured through proven and certified contract manufacturing partners. This allows us to scale to meet growing customer demand without intensive capital investment, leading to strong cash flow conversion, all while ensuring the high |
• | Focus on Product Improvement and Technology Innovation. Voyager offers proprietary architecture advances that lower installation cost and improve operational performance. Our management team has a demonstrated history of driving cost reductions through design innovations, such as our patented fast attach panel installation features that reduce labor requirements and complexity. These innovations help us deliver additional value to our customers and improve our competitive positioning. Additionally, we leverage innovative forecasting and modeling platforms and methods to optimize project yield. |
• | Flexible Capital Structure. We have been able to grow our company without the use of long-term debt as a result of our asset-light contract manufacturing model and by leveraging operating efficiencies. Because we have prudently operated our business since our inception, we have significant capital structure flexibility with which to fund our future growth at an attractive cost of capital. We ended 2020 with a positive net cash position and no long-term debt. |
• | Engineering Services Offerings. Voyager is augmented by our engineering services offerings that assist customers in optimizing our product and reducing total project costs. The engineering services we offer include power plant design services for array layout and electrical design as well as structural and foundation design, and construction engineering consulting services focused on improving productivity and reducing installation times. In the United States, we provided preliminary design services, including array layout, DC collections and energy modeling, for a leading fully-integrated utility-scale solar developer on their portfolio of projects, which has helped to generate further sales of Voyager Trackers to this customer. In emerging markets, these services can provide assistance to less experienced project developers and EPC contractors in their transition from fixed-tilt projects to tracker projects by removing the design barrier. For example, in Vietnam, we provided design services and construction management on-site consulting to a Vietnamese developer for its first two solar sites. |
• | Value-Added Project Management Software. In addition to SunPath, our software that is designed to increase energy production from Voyager, we offer two other software solutions to support our customers in project design and development. The project management software solutions can be coupled with Voyager, but can also be utilized by non-Voyager customers. Our software licensing model also provides additional opportunities for engagement and service, which strengthen customer relationships. Our software offering consists of: |
○ | Atlas. Our Atlas software solution provides project developers and solar asset owners with a “one-stop” solution to manage all solar energy projects on a centralized platform. Atlas is a web-based, enterprise-level database that allows users to manage their project portfolio. Atlas includes project management, financial reporting and data management services that enable clear and consistent project execution from early-stage development through commercial operations. |
○ | SunDAT. Our SunDAT software solution enables automated design and optimization of solar panel systems across residential, commercial and utility-scale sites. SunDAT optimizes system layout, equipment hierarchy and energy output based on local site constraints. |
• | Increasing Our Market Share in the United States. From the first installation of Voyager in the third quarter of 2019, we have quickly built a strong track record of innovative design, construction efficiency and customer engagement. As of December 31, 2020, we had an estimated U.S. tracker market share of approximately 11%, which was calculated using our MW shipped for fiscal year 2020 compared to a total tracker market shipment estimate from a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. We plan to leverage Voyager’s strong value proposition to transition from predominantly contracts for sales for single projects to a mix of such single project sales and contracts for sales for multiple projects with project developers, solar asset owners and EPC contractors. We expect to continue to increase our market share in the United States by leveraging our competitive advantages and building upon the strength of our existing customer relationships and our additional relationships within the solar energy industry. |
• | Expanding Internationally. We believe there is a significant opportunity for us to penetrate additional markets outside of the United States. International markets are experiencing the same benefits from, and trend towards adoption of, trackers as seen in the United States, and represent further upside potential, as these markets have lower tracker penetration today. Cumulative installed capacity outside of the United States is expected to reach approximately 1.7 TW in 2025, up from 775 GW in 2019, according to BNEF NEO. In 2020, we established sales and marketing operations in Asia, the Middle East, North Africa and Australia, and we expect to continue to expand our global footprint in 2021 by establishing similar operations in Latin America and Europe. In addition to our strong product offerings, we believe our growing track record and strong customer relationships will aid our international expansion efforts. |
• | Enhancing Our Product Capability. We believe that Voyager is well-positioned to continue to adapt to evolving changes in panel technology because it has been engineered to be panel agnostic and designed to be flexible to form. We are intensely focused on continuing to enhance our product performance and positioning. Our initial version of Voyager was marketed for inclusion in projects in regions with maximum wind speeds of 105 mph. Throughout 2020, we have released and contracted to sell two additional versions of Voyager that are marketed for inclusion in projects in regions with maximum wind speeds of both 120 mph and 135 mph, according to a 2019 Black & Veatch report. We expect continued growth in sales of these additional versions of Voyager as solar energy projects are increasingly being constructed in coastal regions that have higher wind speeds. In addition, panel manufacturers continue to advance the efficiency of solar panels through design and manufacturing changes, including, in particular, in the form of bifacial panels and larger-format panels. In 2020, we released Voyager+, our next generation single-axis Voyager Tracker, which is compatible with larger-format panels from a variety of solar panel manufacturers and can incorporate larger solar cells, allowing for increased energy production. We were also awarded one of the world’s first larger-format panel projects. |
• | Reducing Operating Costs through Operating Leverage. Throughout 2020, we added 118 employees, predominantly in operations and support as well as in general and administrative capacities, as part of the preparation for our expected expansion in the United States and abroad, as well as to facilitate our operations as a public company following this offering. We have historically prioritized establishing operations in the United States to support the growth we have achieved to date. We expect a significant portion of our incremental headcount additions moving forward to be lower-cost employees to support increased sales (such as field service employees), and expect future growth in sales employees to be focused on lower-cost regions, such as Asia. Approximately 40% of our headcount is currently in lower-cost regions outside of the United States and we expect that figure to grow due to both international market penetration as well as back-office support being increasingly located in those areas. We believe that the scalable nature of our corporate workforce, combined with our focus on hiring employees in lower-cost regions in the future, will provide us with operating efficiencies that will enable us to enhance our profitability as we grow. |
• | Capturing Additional Revenue Streams through Software Services. We believe that our add-on SunPath software, with performance-enhancing algorithms, has the potential to provide significant |
• | Developing Additional Tracker Services. We believe we have additional opportunities to differentiate ourselves as a solar energy solutions provider to our customers through the introduction of a targeted set of offerings beyond sales of Voyager. Similar to our SunPath software solution that was released in the fourth quarter of 2020, we have the ability to introduce hardware and software upgrades and retrofits as well as preventative maintenance services and extended warranty plans, each of which we believe can generate high margin, recurring revenue that also strengthens customer relationships. |
• | Growing through Strategic Acquisitions. We believe that our strong balance sheet affords us the opportunity to access the capital markets on favorable terms, which in turn gives us the option to accelerate our growth through strategic acquisitions. We continue to investigate related products, technologies, software and services to further diversify our platform through strategic acquisitions. While the supply of tracker equipment and software services for solar energy projects will remain our core focus, we may explore additional offerings that add value to our customers and deepen our relationships. |
• | Terrain-Based Tracking. This feature enables Voyager to reduce shading on sloped terrain sites during morning and afternoon backtracking. Elevation data is captured by a drone survey during site commissioning and then stored within each Voyager Tracker that utilizes the SunPath software. Using elevation information for each row in the tracker system allows this algorithm to calculate the daily setpoint angles to minimize row-to-row shading and maximize energy output. |
• | Diffuse Light Optimization. This feature enables Voyager to maximize energy yield during diffuse light conditions created by elements such as clouds, fog, smoke and sand. Typically, trackers try to angle themselves as close to perpendicular to the sun’s position as possible, but during diffuse light conditions, it is advantageous to position the tracker at a flatter or lower angle. This algorithm uses short-term irradiance forecasts based on satellite imagery to determine when a diffuse light condition will exist, and then positions Voyager Trackers that utilize the SunPath software at the angle that maximizes energy output. Our method is unique because it is a purely software-driven optimization with no reliance on on-site sensors that require regular maintenance and cleaning. |
• | Contract Manufacturers. All Voyager components are built to our specification. Based on set criteria, we select contract manufacturers from countries around the world that are well versed in component engineering and change management and stand behind their craftsmanship by providing warranties on defects to support the warranties we provide to our customers. As of December 31, 2020, we had 31 manufacturing partners across 12 countries. Our contract manufacturers undergo a rigorous and continuous qualification process to remain on our approved vendor list, including an evaluation of their business practices. We verify that our contract manufacturers are ISO certified for ISO 14001:2015 (environmental management system certification), ISO 9001:2015 (quality management system certification) and ISO 45001:2018 (occupational health and safety management certification). We also perform due diligence to confirm that our contract manufacturers are in compliance with the FCPA and applicable child labor laws. |
• | Logistics. We select our logistics providers based on similar criteria that we use to select our contract manufacturers. We partner with a leading global third party logistics provider to support our logistic operations. This partnership allows us to develop flexible delivery plans that can accommodate the specific site and construction needs of our customers. |
• | Capacity. We maintain supply source redundancy to help protect our customers from disruptive risks. We have sized our supply chain to meet the variability and seasonality of our customers and industry. We currently have eight GW of annualized supply capacity and seek to deliver a 100% tariff-free solution to our U.S. customers by sourcing supply from qualified manufacturers that are located outside tariff zones and who satisfy our qualification specifications. |
Name | | | Age | | | Position |
Anthony P. Etnyre | | | 51 | | | President and Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Patrick M. Cook | | | 37 | | | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Deepak Navnith | | | 47 | | | Chief Operations Officer |
Nagendra Cherukupalli | | | 61 | | | Chief Technology Officer |
Ali Mortazavi | | | 61 | | | Executive Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing |
Jay B. Grover | | | 59 | | | Vice President, Supply Chain |
Kristian Nolde | | | 44 | | | Vice President, Marketing and Strategy |
Thurman J. “T.J.” Rodgers | | | 72 | | | Chairman of the Board |
David Springer | | | 52 | | | Director |
Ahmad Chatila | | | 53 | | | Director |
William Aldeen (“Dean”) Priddy, Jr. | | | 60 | | | Director |
Isidoro Quiroga Cortés | | | 33 | | | Director |
Shaker Sadasivam | | | 60 | | | Director |
Lisan Hung | | | 52 | | | Director |
• | the Class I directors will be Isidoro Quiroga Cortés, David Springer and Thurman J. “T.J.” Rodgers and their initial terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2022; |
• | the Class II directors will be Shaker Sadasivam and Anthony P. Etnyre and their initial terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023; and |
• | the Class III directors will be Ahmad Chatila, William Aldeen (“Dean”) Priddy, Jr. and Lisan Hung and their initial terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2024. |
• | personal and professional integrity; |
• | ethics and values; |
• | experience in corporate management, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held company; |
• | experience in the industries in which we compete; |
• | experience as a board member or executive officer of another publicly held company; |
• | diversity of background and expertise and experience in substantive matters pertaining to our business relative to other board members; |
• | conflicts of interest; and |
• | practical and mature business judgment. |
• | selecting and hiring our independent auditors, and approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors; |
• | assisting the board of directors in evaluating the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent auditors; |
• | assisting the board of directors in monitoring the quality and integrity of our financial statements and our accounting and financial reporting; |
• | assisting the board of directors in monitoring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; |
• | reviewing with management and our independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting processes; |
• | assisting the board of directors in monitoring the performance of our internal audit function; |
• | reviewing with management and our independent auditors our annual and quarterly financial statements; |
• | reviewing and overseeing all transactions between us and a related person for which review or oversight is required by applicable law or that are required to be disclosed in our financial statements or SEC filings, and developing policies and procedures for the committee’s review, approval and/or ratification of such transactions; |
• | establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and |
• | preparing the audit committee report that the rules and regulations of the SEC require to be included in our annual proxy statement. |
• | reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the board of directors), determining and approving our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level based on such evaluation; |
• | reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to, the compensation of our other executive officers, including annual base salary, bonus and equity-based incentives and other benefits; |
• | reviewing and recommending to the board of directors the compensation of our directors; |
• | appointing and overseeing any compensation consultants; |
• | reviewing and discussing with management our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” disclosure required by SEC rules; |
• | preparing the compensation committee report required by the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement; and |
• | reviewing and making recommendations with respect to our equity and equity-based compensation plans. |
• | assisting our board of directors in identifying prospective director nominees and recommending nominees to the board of directors; |
• | overseeing the evaluation of the board of directors and management; |
• | reviewing developments in corporate governance practices and developing and recommending a set of corporate governance guidelines; and |
• | recommending members for each committee of our board of directors. |
• | Anthony P. Etnyre, Chief Executive Officer; |
• | Patrick M. Cook, Chief Financial Officer; and |
• | Jay B. Grover, Vice President, Supply Chain. |
Name and Principal Position | | | Year | | | Salary ($)(1) | | | Bonus ($)(2) | | | Stock Awards ($)(3) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | | | All Other Compensation ($)(5) | | | Total ($) |
Anthony P. Etnyre Chief Executive Officer | | | 2020 | | | 336,369 | | | 188,622 | | | 5,374,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 11,577 | | | 5,910,568 |
Patrick M. Cook Chief Financial Officer | | | 2020 | | | 283,812 | | | 134,200 | | | 1,343,500 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 11,450 | | | 1,772,962 |
Jay B. Grover Vice President, Supply Chain | | | 2020 | | | 233,221 | | | 90,570 | | | 2,687,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 11,577 | | | 3,022,368 |
(1) | Amounts in this column reflect salary paid to the Named Executive Officers with respect to the 2020 Fiscal Year. See the section entitled “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below for additional details. |
(2) | Amounts in this column reflect the discretionary cash bonuses paid to the Named Executive Officers with respect to the 2020 Fiscal Year. |
(3) | Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of stock awards granted to the Named Executive Officers with respect to the 2020 Fiscal Year. For additional information regarding the calculation of this amount and related assumptions, see Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 under the heading “Determination of Fair Market Value” in this registration statement. For Messrs. Etnyre, Cook and Grover, this amount includes a special, one-time recognition grant of restricted stock units that will only be settled in the form of shares of our common stock upon the occurrence of a “Liquidity Event,” which includes the effectiveness of the registration statement in this offering. See the section entitled “2020 Equity Grants—Recognition Awards” below for additional details. |
(4) | Amounts in this column reflect the annual performance-based bonuses paid to the Named Executive Officers with respect to the 2020 Fiscal Year. No awards were payable based on the “Critical Success Factors” established for 2020. |
(5) | Amounts in this column reflect (i) in the case of Mr. Etnyre, $11,400 in 401(k) plan matching contributions made on his behalf during the 2020 Fiscal Year and the following insurance premiums made on his behalf during the 2020 Fiscal Year: $117 to MetLife Life Insurance and $60 to Insperity Life Insurance, (ii) in the case of Mr. Cook, $11,450 in 401(k) plan matching contributions made on his behalf during the 2020 Fiscal Year and (iii) in the case of Mr. Grover, $11,577 in 401(k) plan matching contributions made on his behalf during the 2020 Fiscal Year. |
| | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)(1) Unexercisable | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | | Option Expiration Date | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5) |
Anthony P. Etnyre | | | 39,583 | | | 60,417 | | | 0 | | | 3.92 | | | 5/09/2029 | | | 25,000 | | | 671,750 | | | 200,000 | | | 5,374,000 |
Patrick M. Cook | | | 53,125 | | | 96,875 | | | 0 | | | 3.92 | | | 11/3/2029 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 50,000 | | | 1,343,500 |
Jay B. Grover | | | 39,583 | | | 10,417 | | | | | 0.57 | | | 03/13/2028 | | | | | | | | | |||||
| | 3,958 | | | 6,042 | | | 0 | | | 3.92 | | | 05/08/2029 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 100,000 | | | 2,687,000 |
(1) | The stock option awards for our Named Executive Officers have a four-year vesting period, with one quarter of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and 1/48 of the award vesting each month thereafter on the anniversary until the end of the four-year vesting period, based on continued employment. |
(2) | This column indicates shares of restricted stock that had not vested as of December 31, 2020. On February 1, 2021, such 25,000 shares of restricted stock vested. |
(3) | Based on the valuation of $26.87 per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2020. |
(4) | The restricted stock units disclosed in this column are vested, subject to the performance condition which requires that a “Liquidity Event,” (as defined in the RSU award agreement) must occur on or before June 29, 2022 in order for the award to settle. The completion of this offering will qualify as a “Liquidity Event” and result in the settlement of the restricted stock unit awards in the form of shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. For more information regarding these recognition grants, see the section entitled “2020 Equity Grants—Recognition Awards.” |
(5) | Based on the valuation of $26.87 per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2020. |
• | Stock Options. The 2017 Plan authorizes the issuance of stock options under the 2017 Plan. Each option issued under the 2017 Plan will indicate whether it is intended to be an ISO or a nonqualified stock option. The exercise price of all stock options granted under the 2017 Plan will be determined by the plan administrator, but in no event may the exercise price be less than 100% of the fair market value of the related shares of common stock on the date of grant. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued as incentive stock options may not exceed ten times the authorized share limit, as amended from time to time, plus to the extent permitted by Section 422 of the Code any shares previously issued under the plan that we reacquire pursuant to a forfeiture provision. The maximum term of all stock options granted under the 2017 Plan will be determined by the plan administrator, but may not exceed ten years. Each stock option will vest and become exercisable at such time and subject to such terms and conditions (including treatment upon the optionee’s termination of employment or service) as determined by the plan administrator in the applicable individual option agreement. The board may provide for accelerated exercisability in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2017 Plan); provided, however, that vesting and exercisability of an option granted to an outside director will be automatically accelerated in full in the event of a Change in Control. A participant will have no voting, dividend or other rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares covered by the option until such person becomes entitled to receive such shares by filing a notice of exercise and paying the exercise price pursuant to the terms of the option. |
• | SARs. SARs may be granted under the 2017 Plan. Each SAR will be granted with a base price that is not less than 100% of the fair market value of the related shares of common stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of all SARs will be determined by the plan administrator, but may not exceed 10 years. Each SARs will vest and become exercisable at such time and subject to such terms and conditions (including treatment upon the grantee’s termination of employment or service) as determined by the plan administrator in the applicable individual award agreement. The board may provide for accelerated exercisability in the event of a Change in Control; provided, however, that vesting and exercisability of SARs granted to an outside director will be automatically accelerated in full in the event of a Change in Control. SARs may be awarded in combination with options and such awards may provide that the SARs will not be exercisable unless the related options are forfeited. The plan administrator may determine to settle the exercise of a SAR in shares of common stock, cash, or any combination thereof. A participant will have no voting, dividend or other rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares covered by the SAR until such person becomes entitled to receive such shares upon exercise of the SAR. |
• | Restricted Stock and RSUs. Restricted stock and RSUs may be granted under the 2017 Plan. The plan administrator will determine the purchase price, vesting schedule and performance objectives, if any, applicable to the grant of restricted stock and RSUs. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement relating to the RSUs, the RSUs will generally be settled when they vest. RSUs issued to date require the occurrence of a “Liquidity Event” (as defined in the applicable award agreement) in order to settle. |
• | Other Stock-Based Awards. Other stock-based awards, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares of common stock (including dividend equivalents) may be granted under the 2017 Plan. The plan administrator will determine the terms and conditions of such other stock-based awards, including the number of shares of common stock to be granted pursuant to such other stock-based awards. |
• | $20,000 annual cash retainer for service as the committee chair of the audit committee; |
• | $15,000 annual cash retainer for service as the committee chair of the compensation committee; and |
• | $10,000 annual cash retainer for service as the committee chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee. |
Name(1) | | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(2) ($) | | | Stock Awards(2) ($) | | | All Other Compensation(3) ($) |
Thurman J. (“T.J.”) Rodgers | | | — | | | 2,687,000 | | | — |
Ahmad Chatila | | | 52,590 | | | — | | | 20,304 |
William Aldeen (“Dean”) Priddy, Jr. | | | 21,923 | | | 268,700 | | | — |
Isidoro Quiroga Cortés | | | — | | | 2,687,000 | | | — |
Shaker Sadasivam | | | — | | | 2,687,000 | | | — |
(1) | In 2020, David Springer served as an executive officer of the Company (in the role of Executive Vice President, Field Operations of the Company), other than a named executive officer, who did not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director. Accordingly, we have omitted Mr. Springer from the Director Compensation Table. |
(2) | Amounts represent, for Mr. Chatila, the fees paid in cash in 2020 for services as a non-executive director, and for Mr. Priddy, cash fees earned with respect to services as a non-employee director in 2020. |
(3) | Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit awards made to the non-employee director during the 2020 Fiscal Year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. |
As of December 31, 2020, our directors held the following restricted stock unit awards in the aggregate: |
Name | | | RSUs (#) |
Thurman J. (“T.J.”) Rodgers | | | 100,000 |
David Springer | | | — |
Ahmad Chatila | | | 37,694 |
William Aldeen (“Dean”) Priddy, Jr. | | | 10,000 |
Isidoro Quiroga Cortés | | | — |
Shaker Sadasivam | | | 100,000 |
(4) | Amounts represent the incremental cost to the Company of providing health and life insurance benefits to the director. |
• | each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock; |
• | each of our directors and named executive officers individually; and |
• | all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
| | | | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned After This Offering | ||||||||||||||
| | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned Before This Offering | | | No exercise of option | | | Full exercise of option | ||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | | | Number | | | % | | | Number | | | % | | | Number | | | % |
5% Stockholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
ARC Family Trust(1) | | | 22,504,507 | | | 33.8 | | | 21,514,907 | | | 26.2 | | | 20,298,869 | | | 24.7 |
South Lake One LLC(2) | | | 15,272,217 | | | 22.9 | | | 14,277,858 | | | 17.4 | | | 13,077,102 | | | 15.9 |
Catherine L. Springer(3) | | | 4,948,003 | | | 7.4 | | | 4,381,122 | | | 5.3 | | | 4,381,122 | | | 5.3 |
Rodgers Massey Revocable Living Trust dated 4/4/11(4) | | | 3,768,069 | | | 5.6 | | | 3,768,069 | | | 4.5 | | | 3,768,069 | | | 4.5 |
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Anthony P. Etnyre(5) | | | 4,275,553 | | | 6.2 | | | 4,275,553 | | | 5.1 | | | 4,275,553 | | | 5.1 |
Patrick M. Cook(6) | | | 2,081,254 | | | 3.1 | | | 2,081,254 | | | 2.5 | | | 2,081,254 | | | 2.5 |
Jay B. Grover(7) | | | 1,245,586 | | | 1.8 | | | 1,111,577 | | | 1.3 | | | 1,111,577 | | | 1.3 |
Thurman J. “T.J.” Rodgers(8) | | | 3,768,069 | | | 5.6 | | | 3,768,069 | | | 4.5 | | | 3,768,069 | | | 4.5 |
David Springer(9) | | | 11,518,077 | | | 17.3 | | | 10,610,943 | | | 12.9 | | | 9,703,809 | | | 11.8 |
Ahmad Chatila | | | 310,850 | | | * | | | 310,850 | | | * | | | 310,850 | | | * |
William Aldeen (“Dean”) Priddy, Jr.(10) | | | 16,493 | | | * | | | 16,493 | | | * | | | 16,493 | | | * |
Isidoro Quiroga Cortés(11) | | | 824,667 | | | 1.2 | | | 255,746 | | | * | | | 255,746 | | | * |
Shaker Sadasivam(12) | | | 25,803,176 | | | 38.7 | | | 23,988,908 | | | 28.9 | | | 22,772,870 | | | 27.4 |
Lisan Hung | | | — | | | * | | | — | | | * | | | — | | | * |
All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (14 individuals) | | | 51,959,268 | | | 77.1% | | | 48,060,340 | | | 57.9 | | | 45,937,169 | | | 55.4 |
* | Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% |
(1) | The ARC Family Trust was established by Mr. Chatila for the benefit of certain members of his family. Mr. Sadasivam is the trustee of the ARC |
(2) | Isidoro Quiroga Moreno directly owns approximately 71% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Inversiones El Aromo Limitada (“El Aromo”). El Aromo directly controls South Cone Investments Limited Partnership, a Canadian limited partnership (“South Cone”), as its general partner with the power to manage South Cone. South Cone directly owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of South Lake One LLC (“South Lake”) and South Lake has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares. Mr. Quiroga Moreno is the father of Mr. Quiroga Cortés. The address for South Lake is 5711 Pdte. Riesco, Office No. 1603, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. We intend to repurchase 994,359 shares of common stock (or 2,195,116 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) from this shareholder, some of which will result from the vesting and settlement of RSUs in connection with this offering, in the Stock Repurchase. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Stock Repurchase Agreements.” |
(3) | The address of this shareholder is 2006 Overcup Dr., Round Rock, TX78681. Ms. Springer is the former spouse of Mr. Springer. We intend to repurchase 566,881 shares of common stock from this shareholder, some of which will result from the vesting and settlement of RSUs in connection with this offering, in the Stock repurchase. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” |
(4) | Consists of (i) 2,943,402 shares of common stock and (ii) 824,667 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested held by the Rodgers Massey Revocable Living Trust dated 4/4/11 (the “Rodgers Trust”). Mr. Rodgers is the trustee of the Rodgers Trust and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares. The address of this shareholder is 575 Eastview Way Woodside, CA 94062. |
(5) | Consists of (i) 824,667 shares of common stock held by Mr. Etnyre, (ii) 1,649,334 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested held by Mr. Etnyre, (iii) 395,148 shares of common stock subject to options that have vested held by Mr. Etnyre, (iv) 34,364 shares of common stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 15, 2021, held by Mr. Etnyre and (v) 1,372,040 shares of common stock held by the Tony Etnyre 2021 GRAT. With respect to the Tony Etnyre 2021 GRAT, Mr. Etnyre (a) is the sole trustee, (b) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the trust, and (c) has sole power to acquire for himself any asset held in the trust, including the shares, by substituting other property of equivalent value. With respect to the Etnyre 2021 Family Trust, Mr. Etnyre's spouse, Brooke Murray-Etnyre, has sole power to acquire for herself any asset held in the trust, including the shares, by substituting other property of equivalent value. Mr. Etnyre disclaims beneficial ownership over the shares held by the Etnyre 2021 Family Trust. |
(6) | Consists of (i) 515,417 shares of common stock subject to options that have vested held by Mr. Cook, (ii) 51,542 shares of common stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 15, 2021, held by Mr. Cook, (iii) 206,167 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested held by the Patrick Cook 2021 Trust, (iv) 206,167 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested and are held by the Cook 2021 Family Trust and (v) 1,101,961 shares of common stock held by the Etnyre 2021 Family Trust for the benefit of certain members of Mr. Etnyre's family. With respect to the Patrick Cook 2021 Trust, Mr. Cook (a) is the sole trustee of the trust and (b) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the trust. With respect to the Patrick Cook 2021 Trust, Mr. Cook's spouse, Brooke Nicole Cook, has sole power to acquire for herself any asset held in the trust, including the shares, by substituting other property of equivalent value. With respect to the Cook 2021 Family Trust, Mr. Cook (a) is the sole investment adviser of the trust, (b) has sole power to direct the trustee as to the voting and disposition of the shares held by the trust, and (c) has sole power to acquire for himself any asset held in the trust, including the shares, by substituting other property of equivalent value. With respect to the Etnyre 2021 Family Trust, Mr. Cook (a) is the sole trustee of the trust and (b) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the trust. |
(7) | Consists of (i) 824,667 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested, (ii) 400,302 shares of common stock subject to options that have vested and (iii) 20,617 shares of common stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 15, 2021, held by Mr. Grover. We intend to repurchase 134,008 shares of common stock from this shareholder, some of which will result from the vesting and settlement of RSUs in connection with this offering, in the Stock Repurchase. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Stock Repurchase Agreements.” |
(8) | Consists of (i) 2,943,402 shares of common stock and (ii) 824,667 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested held by the Rodgers Trust. See also above footnote (4) for further information about the Rodgers Trust. The address of this shareholder is 575 Eastview Way Woodside, CA 94062. |
(9) | Consists of (i) 8,186,421 shares of common stock held by Mr. Springer, (ii) 2,474,001 shares of common stock held by the DS 2021 GRAT, (iii) 329,867 shares of common stock held by the KC 2021 Trust, (iv) 247,400 shares held by the JT 2021 Trust, (v) 247,400 shares held by the SF 2021 Trust and (vi) 32,987 shares of common stock held by the KNS 2021 Trust. With respect to the DS 2021 GRAT, Mr. Springer (a) is the sole trustee, (b) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the trust and (c) has sole power to acquire for himself any asset held in the trust, including the shares, by substituting other property of equivalent value. With respect to the KC 2021 Trust, the JT 2021 Trust, the SF 2021 Trust and the KNS 2021 Trust, Mr. Springer has sole power to acquire for himself any asset held in the trust, including the shares, by substituting other property of equivalent value. We intend to repurchase 907,134 shares of common stock (or 1,814,268 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) of the shares held by Mr. Springer, some of which will result from the vesting and settlement of RSUs in connection with this offering, in the Stock Repurchase. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Stock Repurchase Agreements.” |
(10) | Consists of 16,493 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested held by Mr. Priddy. |
(11) | Consists of 824,667 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested held by Mr. Quiroga Cortés. We intend to repurchase 568,921 shares of common stock from this shareholder, some of which will result from the vesting and settlement of RSUs in connection with this offering, in the Stock Repurchase. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Stock Repurchase Agreements.” |
(12) | Consists of (i) 2,474,001 shares of common stock held by ChristSivam, LLC (ii) 824,667 shares of common stock to be issued from the settlement of restricted stock units that have vested and are held by ChristSivam, LLC and (iii) 2,728,920 shares of common stock held by the ARC Family Trust for the benefit of certain members of Mr. Chatila's family. Mr. Sadasivam is the Manager of ChristSivam, LLC and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by ChristSivam, LLC. See also above footnote (1) for further information about ARC Family Trust. The address of this shareholder is 1950 Pine Run Drive, Chesterfield, MO 63108. We intend to repurchase (i) 989,601 shares of common stock (or 2,205,639 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) of the shares held by ARC Family Trust and (ii) 824,667 of the shares held by ChristSivam LLC, some of which will result from the vesting and settlement of RSUs in connection with this offering, in the Stock Repurchase. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Stock Repurchase Agreements.” |
• | we have been or are to be a participant; |
• | the amount involved exceeds $120,000; and |
• | any of our directors, officers or holders of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. |
| | No Exercise | | | Full Exercise | |||||||
| | Number of shares of common stock to be purchased | | | Aggregate Purchase Price | | | Number of shares of common stock to be purchased | | | Aggregate Purchase Price | |
Nagendra Cherukupalli | | | 412,334 | | | $7,325,114 | | | 412,334 | | | $7,325,114 |
Ali Mortazavi | | | 30,925 | | | 549,383 | | | 30,925 | | | 549,383 |
Jay B. Grover | | | 134,008 | | | 2,380,652 | | | 134,008 | | | 2,380,652 |
Kristian Nolde | | | 31,337 | | | 556,702 | | | 31,337 | | | 556,702 |
David Springer | | | 907,134 | | | 16,115,236 | | | 1,814,268 | | | 32,230,471 |
Isidoro Quiroga Cortés(1) | | | 568,921 | | | 10,106,882 | | | 568,921 | | | 10,106,882 |
ARC Family Trust(2) | | | 989,601 | | | 17,580,262 | | | 2,205,639 | | | 39,183,177 |
South Lake One LLC(1) | | | 994,359 | | | 17,664,788 | | | 2,195,116 | | | 38,996,236 |
Catherine L. Springer | | | 566,881 | | | 10,070,641 | | | 566,881 | | | 10,070,641 |
ChristSivam, LLC(3) | | | 824,667 | | | 14,650,209 | | | 824,667 | | | 14,650,209 |
Total | | | 5,460,167 | | | $96,999,867 | | | 8,784,096 | | | $156,049,465 |
(1) | South Lake One LLC is an entity affiliated with our director Isidoro Quiroga Cortés. |
(2) | ARC Family Trust is an entity affiliated with our director Shaker Sadasivam and family members of our director Ahmad Chatila are beneficiaries of the ARC Family Trust. |
(3) | ChristSivam, LLC is an entity affiliated with our director Shaker Sadasivam. |
• | 850,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0,0001 per share; and |
• | 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. |
• | the designation of the series; |
• | the number of shares of the series, which our board of directors may, except where otherwise provided in the preferred stock designation, increase (but not above the total number of authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the number of shares then outstanding); |
• | whether dividends, if any, will be cumulative or non-cumulative and the dividend rate of the series; |
• | the dates at which dividends, if any, will be payable; |
• | the redemption or repurchase rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of the series; |
• | the terms and amounts of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of shares of the series; |
• | the amounts payable on shares of the series in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our affairs; |
• | whether the shares of the series will be convertible into shares of any other class or series, or any other security, of us or any other entity, and, if so, the specification of the other class or series or other security, the conversion price or prices or rate or rates, any rate adjustments, the date or dates as of which the shares will be convertible and all other terms and conditions upon which the conversion may be made; |
• | restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of any other class or series; and |
• | the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series. |
• | a stockholder who owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock (otherwise known as an “interested stockholder”); |
• | an affiliate of an interested stockholder; or |
• | an associate of an interested stockholder |
• | our board of directors approves the transaction that made the stockholder an “interested stockholder” prior to the date of the transaction; |
• | after the completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, that stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, other than statutorily excluded shares of common stock; or |
• | on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by our board of directors and authorized at a meeting of our stockholders, and not by written consent, by an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder. |
• | a financial institution; |
• | an insurance company; |
• | a controlled foreign corporation; |
• | a passive foreign investment company; |
• | a tax-exempt entity or governmental organization; |
• | a U.S. expatriate or former long-term resident of the United States; |
• | a pass-through entity (such as a partnership or entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) or an investor in such an entity; |
• | a trader, dealer or broker in securities or foreign currencies, including one who elects to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting; |
• | a stockholder who holds shares of our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, appreciated financial position, constructive sale or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
• | a stockholder who acquired shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation; and |
• | a stockholder who actually or constructively owns, or has owned, 10% or more of our stock (by vote or value). |
• | such gain is “effectively connected” with a trade or business of the non-U.S. Holder in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to the non-U.S. Holder’s permanent establishment in the United States); |
• | the non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the exchange and certain other conditions are met; or |
• | shares of our common stock constitute a U.S. real property interest by reason of our status as a U.S. real property holding corporation, or a USRPHC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
• | 1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding, which will equal approximately shares of our common stock immediately after this offering assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option; and |
• | the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on Nasdaq during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to that sale. |
Underwriters | | | Number of Shares |
Barclays Capital Inc. | | | |
BofA Securities, Inc. | | | |
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC | | | |
UBS Securities LLC | | | |
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. | | | |
Cowen and Company, LLC | | | |
Piper Sandler & Co. | | | |
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | | | |
Roth Capital Partners, LLC | | | |
Total | | | 18,421,053 |
• | the obligation to purchase all of the shares of common stock offered hereby (other than those shares of common stock covered by their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares as described below), if any of the shares are purchased; |
• | the representations and warranties made by us to the underwriters are true; |
• | there is no material change in our business or the financial markets; and |
• | we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters. |
| | No Exercise | | | Full Exercise | |
Per Share | | | $ | | | $ |
Total | | | $ | | | $ |
• | the history and prospects for the industry in which we compete; |
• | our financial information; |
• | the ability of our management and our business potential and earning prospects; |
• | the prevailing securities markets at the time of this offering; and |
• | the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly traded shares of generally comparable companies. |
• | Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum. |
• | A short position involves a sale by the underwriters of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to purchase in the offering, which creates the syndicate short position. This short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares involved in the sales made by the underwriters in excess of the number of shares they are obligated to purchase is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase by exercising their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters may close out any short position by either exercising their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares and/or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. |
• | Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. |
• | Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the common stock originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions. |
• | to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Regulation; |
• | to fewer than 150 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined under the Prospectus Regulation), subject to obtaining the prior consent of the underwriters for any such offer; or |
• | in any other circumstances falling within Article 1(4) of the Prospectus Regulation; |
(a) | a corporation (which is not an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA)) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or |
(b) | a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an accredited investor, |
(a) | to an institutional investor or to a relevant person, or to any person arising from an offer referred to in Section 275(1A) or Section 276(4)(i)(B) of the SFA; |
(b) | where no consideration is or will be given for the transfer; |
(c) | where the transfer is by operation of law; or |
(d) | as specified in Section 276(7) of the SFA. |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
ASSETS | | | | | ||
Current assets | | | | | ||
Cash | | | $7,221 | | | $32,359 |
Restricted cash | | | 1,014 | | | 1,014 |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 14,048 | | | 23,734 |
Inventories | | | 4,505 | | | 1,686 |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 3,848 | | | 6,924 |
Total current assets | | | 30,636 | | | 65,717 |
Intangible assets, net | | | 33 | | | — |
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 2,582 | | | 1,857 |
Other assets | | | 579 | | | 3,819 |
Total assets | | | $33,830 | | | $71,393 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | ||
Current liabilities | | | | | ||
Accounts payable | | | $8,191 | | | $17,127 |
Line of credit | | | — | | | 1,000 |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 5,375 | | | 18,495 |
Accrued interest – related party | | | 285 | | | 207 |
Deferred revenue | | | 19,873 | | | 22,980 |
Total current liabilities | | | 33,724 | | | 59,809 |
Long-term debt and other borrowings | | | 1,976 | | | 784 |
Long-term debt – related party | | | 5,857 | | | — |
Other non-current liabilities | | | 715 | | | 3,349 |
Deferred income taxes | | | 3 | | | — |
Total liabilities | | | 42,275 | | | 63,942 |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | | | | | ||
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | | | ||
Common stock par value of $0.0001 per share, 12,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2020 and 2019; 8,022,066 and 7,716,323 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | | 1 | | | 1 |
Treasury stock, at cost (1,200,080 and 0 shares as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) | | | — | | | — |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 18,273 | | | 50,096 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | (3) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (26,719) | | | (42,643) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | (8,445) | | | 7,451 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | $33,830 | | | $71,393 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 |
Service | | | 10,039 | | | 28,427 |
Total revenue | | | 53,124 | | | 187,352 |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | ||
Product | | | 44,212 | | | 155,967 |
Service | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 55,075 | | | 183,713 |
Gross profit (loss) | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development | | | 3,960 | | | 5,222 |
Selling and marketing | | | 1,897 | | | 3,545 |
General and administrative | | | 4,563 | | | 11,798 |
| | 10,420 | | | 20,565 | |
Loss from operations | | | (12,371) | | | (16,926) |
Interest expense, net | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Loss before income taxes | | | (12,825) | | | (17,406) |
(Benefit from) income taxes | | | (39) | | | (83) |
(Income) Loss from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
| | | | |||
Net loss per share | | | | | ||
Basic and diluted | | | $(1.79) | | | $(1.91) |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | | | | | ||
Basic and diluted | | | 7,523,447 | | | 8,344,039 |
| | Common Stock | | | Treasury Stock | | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | |||||||
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2018 | | | 6,808,372 | | | $1 | | | — | | | $ — | | | $11,367 | | | $— | | | $(13,224) | | | $(1,856) |
Restricted stock awards vested during the period | | | 463,462 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Issuance of common stock | | | 444,489 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 6,000 |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 906 | | | — | | | — | | | 906 |
Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (13,495) | | | (13,495) |
Balance as of December 31, 2019 | | | 7,716,323 | | | $1 | | | — | | | $— | | | $18,273 | | | $ — | | | $(26,719) | | | $(8,445) |
Restricted stock awards vested during the period | | | 394,711 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Issuance of common stock | | | 1,111,112 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 30,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 30,000 |
Repurchase of common stock, held in treasury | | | (1,200,080) | | | — | | | 1,200,080 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,823 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,823 |
Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (15,924) | | | (15,924) |
Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3) | | | — | | | (3) |
Balance at December 31, 2020 | | | 8,022,066 | | | $1 | | | 1,200,080 | | | $ — | | | $50,096 | | | $(3) | | | $(42,643) | | | $7,451 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | ||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | | ||
Stock-based compensation | | | 906 | | | 1,818 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 412 | | | 47 |
(Income)/Loss from unconsolidated subsidiary, net of distributions received | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | — | | | 116 |
Warranty provision | | | 2,057 | | | 7,866 |
Warranty recoverable from manufacturers | | | (284) | | | (1,021) |
Bad debt expense | | | 444 | | | 24 |
Deferred income taxes | | | (3) | | | (3) |
Other non-cash items | | | 89 | | | 50 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | ||
Accounts receivable, net | | | (13,838) | | | (9,710) |
Inventories | | | (4,505) | | | 2,819 |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | (3,154) | | | (2,847) |
Other assets | | | (156) | | | (1,672) |
Accounts payable | | | 7,781 | | | 8,936 |
Accruals and other current liabilities | | | 3,389 | | | 7,162 |
Accrued interest – related party debt | | | (289) | | | (78) |
Deferred revenue | | | 19,683 | | | 3,107 |
Other non-current liabilities | | | 1 | | | 496 |
Other, net | | | (1) | | | (298) |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (254) | | | (511) |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | ||
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (18) | | | (256) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated subsidiary, return of investment | | | — | | | 2,124 |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities: | | | (18) | | | 1,868 |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | ||
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 1,000 | | | 784 |
Repayments of borrowings | | | — | | | (7,000) |
Proceeds from stock issuance | | | 6,000 | | | 30,000 |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 7,000 | | | 23,784 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | | | — | | | (3) |
Net increase in cash and restricted cash | | | 6,728 | | | 25,138 |
Cash and restricted cash at beginning of period | | | 1,507 | | | 8,235 |
Cash and restricted cash at end of period | | | $8,235 | | | $33,373 |
| | | | |||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | ||
Cash paid during the year for interest | | | $708 | | | $350 |
Cash paid during the year for income taxes | | | $— | | | $— |
| | | | |||
Reconciliation of cash and restricted cash at period end | | | | | ||
Cash | | | 7,221 | | | 32,359 |
Restricted cash | | | 1,014 | | | 1,014 |
Total cash and restricted cash | | | $8,235 | | | $33,373 |
1. | Description of Business |
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
• | Level 1: Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
• | Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
3. | Revenue |
4. | Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Accrued cost of revenue | | | $2,106 | | | $7,812 |
Accrued expenses | | | 1,644 | | | 2,856 |
Warranty reserves | | | 1,368 | | | 3,985 |
Accrued compensation | | | 177 | | | 2,869 |
Accrued interest expense | | | 47 | | | 28 |
Other | | | 32 | | | 945 |
Total | | | $5,375 | | | $18,495 |
5. | Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Vendor deposits | | | $1,738 | | | $4,205 |
Prepaid expenses | | | 209 | | | 1,043 |
Deferred cost of revenue | | | 19 | | | 992 |
Surety collateral* | | | 1,835 | | | 113 |
Other current assets | | | 47 | | | 571 |
| | $3,848 | | | $6,924 |
* | Surety collateral represents amounts held in deposit to secure performance bonds, which is expected to be ultimately received back in cash when settled. |
6. | Equity Method Investments |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Dimension Energy LLC | | | | | ||
Carrying value | | | $2,582 | | | $1,857 |
Ownership percentage | | | 23.7% | | | 23.6% |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Current assets | | | $4,466 | | | $10,162 |
Non-current assets | | | 13,123 | | | 9,045 |
Current liabilities | | | 3,219 | | | 12,350 |
Non-current liabilities | | | 14,344 | | | 9,723 |
Members’ equity (deficit) | | | 25 | | | (2,866) |
| | Years Ended December 31 | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Revenue | | | $— | | | $22,570 |
Gross profit | | | — | | | 17,360 |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (3,413) | | | 9,185 |
Net income (loss) | | | (2,987) | | | 5,933 |
Share of earnings from equity method investment | | | (709) | | | 1,399 |
7. | Intangible Assets, Net |
| | | | As of December 31, | |||||
| | Estimated Useful Lives (Years) | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Developed technology | | | 3 | | | 1,200 | | | 1,200 |
Total intangible assets | | | | | 1,200 | | | 1,200 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | | | 1,167 | | | 1,200 | |
Total intangible assets, net | | | | | $33 | | | $— |
8. | Debt and Other Borrowings |
9. | Commitments and Contingencies |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Balance at beginning of period | | | $— | | | $2,057 |
Warranties issued during the period | | | 2,057 | | | 7,866 |
Settlements made during the period | | | — | | | (3,111) |
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties | | | — | | | (1) |
Balance at end of period | | | $2,057 | | | $6,811 |
10. | Leases |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
Reported as: | | | 2019 | | | 2020 |
Assets: | | | | | ||
Operating lease right of use assets (included in Other assets) | | | $43 | | | $571 |
Liabilities: | | | | | ||
Operating lease liabilities, current portion (included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities) | | | $11 | | | $242 |
Operating lease liabilities, non-current (included in Other non-current liabilities) | | | 27 | | | 355 |
Total operating lease liabilities | | | $38 | | | $597 |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Cash payments for operating leases | | | $38 | | | $ 140 |
New operating lease assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities | | | $42 | | | $ 672 |
2021 | | | $266 |
2022 | | | 241 |
2023 | | | 128 |
Total future lease payments | | | $635 |
Less imputed interest | | | (38) |
Total lease liability | | | $597 |
11. | Common Stock |
12. | Stock Plans |
| | Options Outstanding | | | | | ||||||
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) | | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | |
Outstanding - December 31, 2019 | | | 980,000 | | | $1.78 | | | | | ||
Granted during the year | | | 63,750 | | | 3.92 | | | | | ||
Exercised or released | | | — | | | — | | | | | ||
Cancelled or forfeited | | | 10,000 | | | 0.57 | | | | | ||
Expired | | | — | | | — | | | | | ||
Balances - December 31, 2020 | | | 1,033,750 | | | $1.93 | | | 7.51 | | | $25,785 |
Vested and expected to vest - December 31, 2020 | | | 1,033,750 | | | $1.93 | | | 7.51 | | | $25,785 |
Exercisable - December 31, 2020 | | | 652,283 | | | $1.28 | | | 7.11 | | | $16,693 |
| | Unvested Restricted Stock Units | | | Unvested Restricted Stock Awards | |||||||
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted-Average Intrinsic Value | | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
Unvested as of December 31, 2019 | | | 100,000 | | | $13.50 | | | 536,538 | | | $0.54 |
Granted | | | 1,479,580 | | | 26.87 | | | — | | | — |
Vested | | | — | | | — | | | 394,711 | | | 0.54 |
Forfeited or canceled | | | 10,000 | | | 26.87 | | | — | | | — |
Unvested as of December 31, 2020 | | | 1,569,580 | | | $26.02 | | | 141,827 | | | $0.54 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Cost of revenue | | | $176 | | | 322 |
General and administrative | | | 653 | | | 1,401 |
Research and development | | | 51 | | | 57 |
Selling and marketing | | | 26 | | | 38 |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | $906 | | | 1,818 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Expected term (years) | | | 5.66 – 6.09 | | | 5.99 – 6.17 |
Expected volatility | | | 52.01% - 54.10% | | | 51.52% - 51.58% |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.63% - 2.3% | | | 1.60% - 1.61% |
Expected dividends | | | — | | | — |
Grant date fair value per option | | | $10.49 - $10.71 | | | $23.55 - $23.58 |
13. | Net loss per share |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Basic and diluted: | | | | | ||
Net loss | | | $13,495 | | | $15,924 |
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding | | | 7,523 | | | 8,344 |
Basic and diluted loss per share | | | $1.79 | | | $1.91 |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Shares of common stock issuable under stock option plans outstanding | | | 980 | | | 1,034 |
Shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock awards | | | 637 | | | 1,711 |
Potential common shares excluded from diluted net loss per share | | | 1,617 | | | 2,745 |
14. | Income Taxes |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
U.S. | | | $(13,534) | | | $(16,269) |
Foreign | | | — | | | 262 |
Total loss before income taxes | | | $(13,534) | | | $(16,007) |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Current | | | | | ||
Federal | | | $— | | | $(159) |
State | | | (37) | | | 1 |
Foreign | | | — | | | 78 |
Deferred | | | | | ||
Federal | | | (2) | | | (3) |
State | | | — | | | — |
Total income tax expense/(benefit) | | | $(39) | | | $(83) |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) derived by applying the federal statutory tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes | | | $(2,842) | | | $(3,362) |
State taxes, net of federal | | | (551) | | | (215) |
Research and experimentation tax credit | | | (118) | | | (179) |
Valuation allowance | | | 3,184 | | | 3,523 |
Stock compensation | | | 225 | | | 406 |
Dividends received deduction | | | — | | | (308) |
Permanent differences and other | | | 63 | | | 52 |
| | $(39) | | | $(83) |
| | As of December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | ||
Fixed assets and intangibles | | | $156 | | | $135 |
Leases | | | — | | | 106 |
Accrued expenses | | | 333 | | | 2,066 |
Net operating loss carryforward | | | 4,626 | | | 6,679 |
Capital loss carryforward | | | 501 | | | — |
Investment difference | | | — | | | 148 |
R&D credit carryforward | | | 181 | | | 325 |
Subtotal | | | 5,797 | | | 9,459 |
Less valuation allowance | | | (5,774) | | | (9,297) |
Total deferred tax asset | | | 23 | | | 162 |
| | | | |||
Deferred tax (liabilities): | | | | | ||
Investment difference | | | (15) | | | — |
Leases | | | — | | | (101) |
Prepaid expenses | | | (11) | | | (61) |
Total deferred tax (liability) | | | (26) | | | (162) |
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | | | $(3) | | | $— |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Balance, beginning of the year | | | $22 | | | $45 |
Increase for tax positions related to the current year | | | 23 | | | 36 |
Decrease for tax positions related to prior years | | | — | | | — |
Balance, end of year | | | $45 | | | $81 |
15. | Retirement Plan |
16. | Segment Information |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
United States | | | $45,264 | | | $187,093 |
Vietnam | | | 7,149 | | | 38 |
Other | | | 711 | | | 221 |
Total net revenue | | | $53,124 | | | $187,352 |
17. | Related Parties |
18. | Subsequent Events |
19. | Subsequent Events (Unaudited) |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Numerator | | | | | ||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
Denominator | | | | | ||
Weighted-average shares used in computing pro forma net loss per share only after giving effect of a 8.25-for-1 stock split, basic and diluted | | | 62,043 | | | 68,811 |
Pro forma net loss per share, basic and diluted | | | $(0.22) | | | $(0.23) |
Barclays | | | BofA Securities | | | Credit Suisse | | | UBS Investment Bank |
HSBC | |||
Cowen | Simmons Energy | A Division of Piper Sandler | Raymond James | Roth Capital Partners |
Item 13. | Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution. |
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution ($ thousands) | | | $ Amount to be Paid |
SEC registration fee | | | $46,224 |
FINRA filing fee | | | 53,000 |
Nasdaq listing fee | | | 295,000 |
Transfer agent and registrar fees | | | 4,500 |
Printing expenses | | | 130,000 |
Legal fees and expenses | | | 2,500,000 |
Accounting fees and expenses | | | 2,800,000 |
Blue Sky fees and expenses | | | 45,000 |
Miscellaneous expenses | | | 50,000 |
Total | | | $5,923,724 |
Item 14. | Indemnification of Directors and Officers. |
Item 15. | Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. |
Item 16. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
(a) | Exhibits. See the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the signature pages hereto, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. |
(b) | Financial Statement Schedules. None. |
Item 17. | Undertakings. |
(a) | For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective. |
(b) | For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
Exhibit Number | | | Description |
| | Form of Underwriting Agreement(a) | |
| | Certificate of Incorporation of FTC Solar, Inc., as currently in effect(a) | |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of FTC Solar, Inc., to be in effect upon the completion of this offering(a) | |
| | Bylaws of FTC Solar, Inc., as currently in effect(a) | |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of FTC Solar, Inc., to be in effect upon the completion of this offering(a) | |
| | Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate(a) | |
| | Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP(a) | |
| | FTC Solar, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan(a)(b) | |
| | FTC Solar, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan and form of agreement(a)(b) | |
| | FTC Solar, Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(a)(b) | |
| | Form of Indemnification Agreement(a) | |
| | Form of Employment Agreement by and between FTC Solar, Inc. and Anthony P. Etnyre(a)(b) | |
| | Form of Employment Agreement by and between FTC Solar, Inc. and Patrick M. Cook(a)(b) | |
| | Form of Employment Agreement by and between FTC Solar, Inc. and Jay B. Grover(a)(b) | |
| | Form of Registration Rights Agreement, by and among FTC Solar, Inc. and certain holders of its capital stock(a) | |
| | List of Subsidiaries of FTC Solar, Inc.(a) | |
| | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
| | Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)(a) | |
| | Consent of Eclipse-M(a) | |
| | Power of Attorney (included in signature page) |
(a) | Previously filed. |
(b) | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| | FTC SOLAR, INC. | ||||
| | | ||||
| | By: | | | /s/ Anthony P. Etnyre | |
| | | | Name: Anthony P. Etnyre | ||
| | | | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
Signature | | | Title | | | Date |
| | | | |||
/s/ Anthony P. Etnyre | | | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | | | April 27, 2021 |
Anthony P. Etnyre | | |||||
| ||||||
/s/ Patrick M. Cook | | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | | | April 27, 2021 |
Patrick M. Cook | | |||||
| ||||||
/s/ M. Cathy Behnen | | | Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | | | April 27, 2021 |
M. Cathy Behnen | | |||||
| ||||||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
T.J. Rodgers | | |||||
| ||||||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
David Springer | | |||||
| ||||||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
Ahmad Chatila | | |||||
| ||||||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
William Aldeen (“Dean”) Priddy, Jr. | |
Signature | | | Title | | | Date |
| ||||||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
Isidoro Quiroga Cortés | | |||||
| ||||||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
Shaker Sadasivam | | |||||
| | | | |||
* | | | Director | | | April 27, 2021 |
Lisan Hung | |
*By: | | | /s/ Anthony P. Etnyre | | | |
| | Anthony P. Etnyre | | | ||
| | Attorney-in-fact | | |