| | Page | |
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
Delaware | | | 3674 | | | 81-4816270 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Andrea L. Nicolás, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP One Manhattan West New York, New York 10001 (212) 735-3000 | | | Jacob D. Wolf, Esq. General Counsel and Secretary FTC Solar, Inc. 9020 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite I-260, Austin, Texas 78759 (737) 787-7906 | | | Benjamin K. Marsh, Esq. Goodwin Procter LLP 620 Eighth Avenue New York, New York 10018 (212) 813-8800 |
Large accelerated filer | | | ☐ | | | Accelerated filer | | | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | | | ☒ | | | Smaller reporting company | | | ☐ |
| | | | Emerging growth company | | | ☒ |
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered | | | Amount to be Registered(1) | | | Proposed Maximum Offering Price per Share(1) | | | Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)(2) | | | Amount of Registration Fee(3) |
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share | | | 21,184,210 | | | $20.00 | | | $423,684,200 | | | $46,224.00 |
(1) | Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933. |
(2) | Includes shares which may be sold pursuant to the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. |
(3) | Of this amount, the Registrant previously paid $10,910.00 of the total registration fee in connection with the previous filing of the Registration Statement. |
PROSPECTUS | | |
| | Per Share | | | Total | |
Public offering price | | | $ | | | $ |
Underwriting discounts and commissions(a) | | | $ | | | $ |
Proceeds to us before expenses | | | $ | | | $ |
(a) | See “Underwriting” for a complete description of the compensation payable to the underwriters. |
Barclays | | | BofA Securities | | | Credit Suisse | | | UBS Investment Bank |
HSBC | |||
Cowen | Simmons Energy | A Division of Piper Sandler | Raymond James | Roth Capital Partners |
• | Allied Market Research – Solar Energy Market by Technology, Solar Module, Application and End-Use: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2019-2026 |
• | Australia Clean Energy Council – Clean Energy Australia Report 2020 |
• | Black & Veatch Holding Company (“Black & Veatch”) – Voyager Photovoltaic Single Axis Tracker – Independent Assessment – 2019 |
• | Bloomberg New Energy Finance (“BNEF”) – 2020 New Energy Outlook (“NEO”) |
• | BNEF – 2H 2020 LCOE Update |
• | BNEF – Capacity Forecast Update |
• | Eclipse-M – FTC Solar Voyager Single-Axis Tracker Market Annual 2020 Update: Comparison Report |
• | IHS Markit Ltd (“IHS Markit”) – Global PV Tracker Market Report: 2020 |
• | IHS Markit – PV Installations Tracker |
• | International Renewable Energy Agency (“IRENA”) – Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019 |
• | InfoLink Consulting Co., Ltd. (“PV InfoLink”) – The New Era of PV: 600W+ Modules |
• | Solar Energy Industries Association (“SEIA”) – Solar Industry Research Data |
• | United States Energy Information Administration – United States Electricity Profile 2019 |
• | United States Environmental Protection Agency – Air Pollutant Emissions Trends Data |
• | United States Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (“SIF”) – Report on U.S. Sustainable and Impact Investing Trends 2020 |
• | United States National Renewable Energy Laboratory (“NREL”) – Understanding Bifacial Photovoltaics Potential: Field Performance – December 2019 |
• | Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables (“Wood Mackenzie”) – The Global PV Tracker Landscape 2019 |
• | Wood Mackenzie – Global Bifacial Module Market Report 2019 |
• | Wood Mackenzie – Global Solar PV Market Outlook Update – Q3 2020 |
• | Wood Mackenzie – H2 2020 U.S. Solar PV System Pricing |
• | Wood Mackenzie – The Global Solar PV Tracker Landscape 2020 |
• | Industry-Leading Installation Speed and Low Labor Costs. Voyager requires up to 56% fewer foundations per MW than other competing solutions, or only seven structural foundations, or piles, per row. This results in 15% less steel content in projects using our system. Voyager also utilizes (i) simplified assembly methods that require fewer tools and up to 45% fewer connection points between piles than competing solutions and (ii) our patented panel hanging and self-alignment features, which together result in industry-leading installation speeds. In a study we commissioned in 2020, Eclipse-M, a nationally-recognized construction management consultant, found that Voyager’s installation time is 41% less than the industry average, or 211 person-hours per MW compared to 355 person-hours per MW for the trackers of our leading competitors that were evaluated in the study. In the United States, Australia and parts of Europe, we estimate that this reduced installation time, together with EPC contractors’ savings on materials due to our design methodologies (which are applicable to all sales markets), can result in 1.5-2.0 cents per watt of cost savings as compared to industry-leading one-panel in-portrait and two-panel in-portrait competitors. As such, on a 50 MW system in the United States, this could represent up to $1 million of project savings. In 2020, we reduced the installation time of our products by 32% from 2019 and we believe there is an opportunity to further reduce our customers' average installation cost through additional product innovation and installation technique improvements. Faster installation times are an increasingly impactful competitive advantage, as labor is a significant and growing contributor to total solar energy project costs, increasing from 22% in 2015 to 35% for standard 10 MW tracker projects in 2020 (over this same period, equipment costs have decreased from representing 66% to 51% of total costs of these projects), according to a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. While independent row trackers are typically more expensive due to the higher-technology equipment required for their operation, we believe our independent row design offsets these higher fixed costs with lower installation cost and increased energy production. |
• | Design Flexibility that Optimizes Solar Panel Density. Voyager has a typical row length of 60 meters, compared to the significantly longer row lengths of some of our competitors’ systems, providing relative site design flexibility. Additionally, the two-panel in-portrait design of Voyager provides twice the number of solar panels across a given length of row compared to one-panel in-portrait systems. This increased panel density allows for greater design flexibility on sites with irregular boundaries, maximizes the use of available land and helps to preserve site environment. We believe these features, combined with the slope and terrain flexibility of Voyager, will be increasingly advantageous moving forward as an increasing percentage of solar projects are developed on sites with irregular boundaries and undulating terrain. Additionally, two-panel in-portrait systems capture more diffuse light due to their increased height as compared to one-panel in-portrait systems, and have higher panel performance from the reduced impact of radiant ground heat. |
• | Slope and Terrain Flexibility. Our independent row design allows for simplified installation on undulating terrain and irregular site boundaries. With no connection point between sequential rows, unlike linked-row systems, each Voyager row can be positioned without consideration of adjacent rows, enabling optimized row configuration. Additionally, Voyager’s adjustable design mounting allows for installation on terrain with slopes of up to 17.5% grade. This deployment flexibility allows Voyager to maximize solar energy production on sloped terrain while avoiding high grading costs, and our customers have the opportunity to enhance such benefits through the use of our SunPath tracking algorithm that reduces row-to-row shading. |
• | Structural Design that Optimizes Bifacial Panel Yield. Bifacial panels collect solar energy from both sides of the solar panel, resulting in up to a 9% gain in energy production compared with monofacial panels, according to an ongoing study by NREL. This efficiency improvement over traditional solar panels is driving a significant market shift to the use of bifacial panels, with bifacial panels expected to account for 17% of total installed solar capacity by 2024, quadrupling its share in 2019, according to a 2019 Wood Mackenzie report. We believe Voyager improves bifacial panel yield as compared to one-panel in-portrait systems by approximately 2% due to its structural design that minimizes rear side shading, increases rear side irradiance and improves thermal performance. |
• | DC Collections Advantages. In utility-scale solar projects, individual solar panels are wired in series into strings of solar panels, which typically consist of approximately 30 individual solar panels per string. Voyager can support four strings of panels per row versus the more common single-axis structure that only supports three strings of panels per row. This four string architecture allows for approximately 25% less direct current (“DC”) cabling to collect the power from each row, which we believe results in cost savings on materials and labor. In addition, the symmetric four string Voyager architecture, which isolates strings of panels into four quadrants on the tracker row, allows projects using Voyager to observe significantly less mismatch loss for bifacial panels compared to projects using (i) one-panel in-portrait single-axis trackers or (ii) two-panel in-portrait three string trackers that cannot isolate strings of panels onto a single side of the tracker. We believe Voyager’s reduction in mismatch loss for bifacial panels provides a significant energy production advantage compared to other trackers. |
• | Site Accessibility. Our two-panel in-portrait architecture maximizes row spacing and allows improved site access for operations and maintenance of the solar energy project or the grounds on which the project is sited. For an equivalent panel density or ground coverage ratio, Voyager provides twice the spacing between rows compared to one-panel in-portrait systems. This increased, open row spacing allows for vehicle access even in the most dense system layouts. Additionally, unlike linked-row systems, our design has no physical barriers that prevent movement between rows, such as movement undertaken during routine ground maintenance, which is important to maintain energy yields from the rear facing panel of bifacial solar panels. |
• | Performance-Enhancing Software Solution. Voyager uses a motor and slew drive on each row to continuously align the solar panels to the sun through the use of our baseline, proprietary solar tracking algorithm. Our customers also have the option to license our premium performance-enhancing software solution, SunPath, that uses proprietary algorithms that take into consideration topography, meteorological conditions and other local site conditions to reduce shading on every row and adjust panel positioning to address diffused light conditions (e.g. cloud cover), which results in optimized tracking and solar energy generation. Our SunPath software solution was released in the fourth quarter of 2020 and is backward compatible with all previously installed Voyager systems. |
• | Cost Competitiveness with Fossil-Fuel Energy Generation. Solar energy is currently one of the cheapest sources of new-build power generation, on an LCOE basis, in countries that account for approximately two-thirds of the global population and is forecasted to continue decreasing in cost to become the cheapest form of wholesale electric generation in the United States by 2022, according to BNEF. |
• | Governmental Policies and Regulations Across the Globe Supporting Renewable Energy. Governments across the globe have established policies to support a transition away from fossil fuels and towards low-carbon forms of energy, such as solar power. In the United States, for example, 30 states and the District of Columbia have implemented Renewable Portfolio Standards (“RPS”), which require a specified percentage of the electricity sold by utilities to come from renewable resources by a certain date. Global renewable energy support has accelerated since the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which became effective in 2016. |
• | Corporate Procurement of Renewable Energy. Companies across a variety of industries have become increasingly focused on the climate impact of their operations. For example, over 1,000 companies around the world have committed to or already set science-based greenhouse gas emissions targets in accordance with the goals of the Paris Agreement, according to The Science Based Targets initiative. Since fossil fuel-based energy generation is one of the main sources of corporate greenhouse gas emissions, shifting to renewable energy is a primary way for companies to reduce their carbon emissions and achieve such targets. |
• | Improvement in Battery Storage Technology. Recent advances in technology and cost reductions have helped battery storage emerge as a solution to the intermittent nature of solar power. The cumulative installed capacity of energy storage projects is expected to increase from 11 GW in 2020 to 168 GW in 2030, according to BNEF NEO. The ability of battery technology to convert solar energy to a baseload form of power is expected to establish solar energy as a firm, reliable source of power, increasing overall demand for solar energy. |
• | Continued Development of Newly-Renewable Use Cases. The increased cost competitiveness of electricity is driving new sectors of the economy to switch from fossil fuels to electricity as their source of energy, such as passenger and commercial vehicles, and heating and industrial processes. |
• | Increased Capital Available for Green Investments. Environmental responsibility has become a priority for investors, demonstrated by a meaningful trend in allocation of capital to companies that are leading and committed to the energy transition from fossil fuels to low-carbon alternatives. |
• | Market and Product Positioning. In designing Voyager, we sought to introduce a solution that is differentiated from existing industry solutions and positioned to address the future needs of the solar industry as it continues to develop. In addition to benefitting from the growth in solar energy and the increasing penetration of trackers, we believe we are positioned to benefit from the accelerating adoption of two-panel in-portrait tracker systems, bifacial panels and larger-format or higher-powered bifacial panels. Our two-panel in-portrait solutions are already optimized for bifacial panels. In 2020, we introduced our first Voyager solution designed for the new larger-format panels entering the marketplace and were awarded one of the world’s first larger-format panel projects. |
• | Management Team with Extensive Renewable Energy Industry Experience. Our management team has global experience across the full solar energy project lifecycle, including project development, finance, equipment supply, construction and operations. Since 2013, our management team has spearheaded the design and delivery of more than 2.7 GW of single-axis tracker equipment, attributable to both the AP90 tracker (and its predecessor product) and Voyager. Our management team’s experience beyond these products includes the development, financing and construction of more than 5.5 GW of utility-scale solar energy projects. |
• | Multi-Region, Asset-Light Contract Manufacturing Model. Voyager is manufactured through proven and certified contract manufacturing partners. This allows us to scale to meet growing customer demand without intensive capital investment, leading to strong cash flow conversion, all while ensuring the high quality of our products. Our contract manufacturing partners are subject to a rigorous qualification process, which includes third party audits and production monitoring. Our global supply chain allows us to optimize logistics and lead times for both domestic and international growth. This provides geographic diversity which reduces the impact of trade tariffs and enables the reliable supply of our product. |
• | Focus on Product Improvement and Technology Innovation. Voyager offers proprietary architecture advances that lower installation cost and improve operational performance. These innovations help us deliver additional value to our customers and improve our competitive positioning. Additionally, we leverage innovative forecasting and modeling platforms and methods to optimize project yield. |
• | Flexible Capital Structure. We have been able to grow our company without the use of long-term debt as a result of our asset-light contract manufacturing model and by leveraging operating efficiencies. Because we have prudently operated our business since our inception, we have significant capital structure flexibility with which to fund our future growth at an attractive cost of capital. We ended 2020 with a positive net cash position and no long-term debt. |
• | Engineering Services Offerings. Voyager is augmented by our engineering services offerings that assist customers in optimizing our product and reducing total project costs. The engineering services we offer include power plant design services for array layout and electrical design as well as structural and foundation design, and construction engineering consulting services focused on improving productivity and |
• | Value-Added Project Management Software. In addition to SunPath, our software that is designed to increase energy production from Voyager, we offer two other software solutions to support our customers in project design and development, Atlas and SunDAT. These project management software solutions can be coupled with Voyager, but can also be utilized by non-Voyager customers. Our software licensing model also provides additional opportunities for engagement and service, which strengthen customer relationships. |
• | Increasing Our Market Share in the United States. From the first installation of Voyager in the third quarter of 2019, we have quickly built a strong track record of innovative design, construction efficiency and customer engagement. As of December 31, 2020, we had an estimated U.S. tracker market share of approximately 11%, which was calculated using our MW shipped for fiscal year 2020 compared to a total tracker market shipment estimate from a 2020 Wood Mackenzie report. We plan to leverage Voyager’s strong value proposition to transition from predominantly contracts for sales for single projects to a mix of such single project sales and contracts for sales for multiple projects with project developers, solar asset owners and EPC contractors. |
• | Expanding Internationally. We believe there is a significant opportunity for us to penetrate additional markets outside of the United States. International markets are experiencing the same benefits from, and trend towards adoption of, trackers as seen in the United States, and represent further upside potential, as these markets have lower tracker penetration today. Cumulative installed capacity outside of the United States is expected to reach approximately 1.7 TW in 2025, up from 775 GW in 2019, according to BNEF NEO. In 2020, we established sales and marketing operations in Asia, the Middle East, North Africa and Australia, and we expect to continue to expand our global footprint in 2021 by establishing similar operations in Latin America and Europe. In addition to our strong product offerings, we believe our growing track record and strong customer relationships will aid our international expansion efforts. |
• | Enhancing Our Product Capability. We believe that Voyager is well-positioned to continue to adapt to evolving changes in panel technology because it has been engineered to be panel agnostic and designed to be flexible to form. We are intensely focused on continuing to enhance our product performance and positioning. Our initial version of Voyager was marketed for inclusion in projects in regions with maximum wind speeds of 105 mph. Throughout 2020, we have released and contracted to sell two additional versions of Voyager that are marketed for inclusion in projects in regions with maximum wind speeds of both 120 mph and 135 mph, according to a 2019 Black & Veatch report. In addition, panel manufacturers continue to advance the efficiency of solar panels through design and manufacturing changes, including, in particular, in the form of bifacial panels and larger-format panels. In 2020, we released Voyager+, our next generation single-axis Voyager Tracker, which is compatible with larger-format panels from a variety of solar panel manufacturers and we were awarded one of the world’s first larger-format panel projects. |
• | Reducing Operating Costs through Operating Leverage. We believe that the scaling of our workforce in 2020, combined with our focus on lower-cost employees and lower-cost regions in the future, such as Asia, provides us with operating efficiencies that will enable us to enhance our profitability as we grow. We have historically prioritized establishing operations in the United States to support the growth we have achieved to date. We expect a significant portion of our incremental headcount additions moving forward to be lower-cost employees to support increased sales (such as field service employees), and expect future growth in sales employees to be focused on lower-cost regions. |
• | Capturing Additional Revenue Streams through Software Services. We believe that our add-on SunPath software, with performance-enhancing algorithms, has the potential to provide significant |
• | Developing Additional Tracker Services. We believe we have additional opportunities to differentiate ourselves as a solar energy solutions provider to our customers through the introduction of a targeted set of offerings beyond sales of Voyager. We have the ability to introduce hardware and software upgrades and retrofits as well as preventative maintenance services and extended warranty plans, each of which we believe can generate high margin, recurring revenue that also strengthens customer relationships. |
• | Growing through Strategic Acquisitions. We believe that our strong balance sheet affords us the opportunity to access the capital markets on favorable terms, which in turn gives us the option to accelerate our growth through strategic acquisitions. We continue to investigate opportunities to further diversify our platform through strategic acquisitions. |
• | our limited operating history and the rapidly changing solar industry make it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects and we may not achieve profitability in the future; |
• | we have a history of losses that may continue in the future, and we may not achieve profitability; |
• | the market for our products and services is highly competitive and rapidly evolving and we expect to face increased competition; |
• | if potential owners of solar energy systems incorporating our solar tracker systems are unable to secure financing on acceptable terms, we could experience a reduction in the demand for our products; |
• | our dependence on a limited number of customers may impair our ability to operate profitably; |
• | we invest significant time, resources and management attention to identifying and developing project leads that are subject to our sales and marketing focus and if we are unsuccessful in converting such project leads (or awarded orders) into binding purchase orders, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected; |
• | we plan to expand into additional international markets, which will expose us to additional regulatory, economic, political, reputational and competitive risks; |
• | we may acquire other companies or technologies, which could divert our management’s attention, result in dilution to our stockholders, reduce our available cash that could be used for other purposes and otherwise disrupt our operations and harm our results of operations; |
• | defects or quality or performance problems in our products could result in loss of customers, reputational damage and decreased revenue, and we may face warranty, indemnity and product liability claims arising from defective products; |
• | we face risks related to actual or threatened health epidemics, such as the novel coronavirus |
• | if we fail, in whole or in part, to obtain, maintain, protect, defend or enforce our intellectual property and other proprietary rights, our business and results of operations could be materially harmed; |
• | we depend upon a limited number of outside contract manufacturers, and our operations could be disrupted if our relationships with these contract manufacturers are compromised; |
• | we may experience delays, disruptions or quality control problems in our contract manufacturers’ manufacturing operations, which could result in reputational damage and other liabilities to our customers; |
• | failure by our contract manufacturers to use ethical business practices and comply with applicable laws and regulations may adversely affect our business; |
• | in certain circumstances, our contract manufacturers are dependent on ocean transportation to deliver our products. If our contract manufacturers experience disruptions in the use of ocean transportation, which includes vessels, ports and related infrastructure and logistics, to deliver our products, our business and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted; |
• | the reduction, elimination or expiration of government incentives for, or regulations mandating the use of, as well as corporate commitments to the use of, renewable energy and solar energy specifically could reduce demand for solar energy systems and harm our business; |
• | changes in the U.S. trade environment, including the imposition of import tariffs, could adversely affect the amount or timing of our revenue, results of operations or cash flows; and |
• | we could be adversely affected by any violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”), and other foreign anti-bribery laws, as well as of export controls and economic sanctions laws. |
• | we are permitted to include only two years of audited financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure; |
• | we are not required to engage an auditor to report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; |
• | we are permitted to take advantage of extended transition periods for complying with new or revised accounting standards which allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of some accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies; |
• | we are not required to submit certain executive compensation matters to stockholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay,” “say-on-frequency” and “say-on-golden parachutes;” and |
• | we are not required to comply with certain disclosure requirements related to executive compensation, such as the requirement to disclose the correlation between executive compensation and performance and the requirement to present a comparison of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to our median employee compensation. |
• | $181.0 million for general corporate purposes, including working capital and operating expenses. We may also use a portion of such proceeds to acquire or invest in businesses, products, services or technologies, however, we do not have binding agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions or investments at this time. |
• | $140.3 million to purchase an aggregate of 7,894,735 shares of our common stock (or $189.3 million to purchase 10,657,892 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), some of which will result from the settlement of certain vested RSUs and the exercise of certain options in connection with this offering, from the Stock Repurchase Parties at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. |
• | 12,324,533 shares of common stock reserved for future grant or issuance under our 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) and 1,643,271 shares of common stock reserved for future grant or issuance under our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which shares will automatically increase each year, as more fully described in “Executive and Director Compensation;” |
• | 8,236,363 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding as of March 31, 2021, having a weighted-average exercise price of $0.23 per share (with 5,802,779 of such options being vested as of March 31, 2021); |
• | 15,462,270 shares of common stock issuable upon settlement of RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2021, having an estimated grant date fair value of $7.15 per share (with 10,915,938 of such RSUs being vested as of March 31, 2021); and |
• | 32,467 shares of our common stock that we intend to repurchase and retire pursuant to the Stock Repurchase resulting from the exercise of certain options and 4,192,896 shares of our common stock that we intend to repurchase and retire pursuant to the Stock Repurchase resulting from the settlement of certain vested RSUs in connection with this offering. |
• | a 8.25-for-1 stock split to be effected prior to the closing of this offering (the “Forward Stock Split”); |
• | no exercise, settlement or termination of outstanding options or RSUs after March 31, 2021, except in connection with the settlement of certain vested RSUs and the exercise of certain options for the Stock Repurchase; |
• | the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation in Delaware and the adoption of our amended and restated bylaws immediately prior to the closing of this offering; |
• | an initial public offering price of $19.00 per share of common stock, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus; and |
• | no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase additional shares of our common stock. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product revenue | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 |
Service revenue | | | 10,039 | | | 28,427 |
Total revenue | | | 53,124 | | | 187,352 |
Cost of revenue(1): | | | | | ||
Product cost of revenue | | | 44,212 | | | 155,967 |
Service cost of revenue | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 55,075 | | | 183,713 |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development(1) | | | 3,960 | | | 5,222 |
Selling and marketing(1) | | | 1,897 | | | 3,545 |
General and administrative(1) | | | 4,563 | | | 11,798 |
Total operating expenses | | | 10,420 | | | 20,565 |
Loss from operations | | | (12,371) | | | (16,926) |
Interest expense, net | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Loss before income taxes | | | (12,825) | | | (17,406) |
Benefit from income taxes | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
| | | | |||
Net loss per share | | | | | ||
Basic and diluted | | | (1.79) | | | (1.91) |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | | | | | ||
Basic and diluted | | | 7,523,447 | | | 8,344,039 |
Pro forma net loss per share information (unaudited)(2) | | | | | ||
Pro forma net loss | | | | | (51,280) | |
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share | | | | | (0.70) | |
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted | | | | | 73,564,070 |
(1) | Costs and expenses include stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Cost of revenue | | | $ 176 | | | $322 |
General and administrative | | | 653 | | | 1,401 |
Research and development | | | 51 | | | 57 |
Selling and marketing | | | 26 | | | 38 |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | $ 906 | | | $1,818 |
(2) | Pro forma basic net loss per share is computed using pro forma net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, the effect of assumed vesting of the RSUs with service condition satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and the effect of the Forward Stock Split. Pro forma diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares, the effect of assumed vesting of the RSUs with service condition satisfied, the effect of potentially dilutive equity awards outstanding during the period and the effect of the Forward Stock Split. There were no potentially dilutive equity securities in the period presented. |
| | As of December 31, 2020 | |||||||
| | Actual | | | Pro Forma(1) | | | Pro Forma as Adjusted(2)(3) | |
| | (in thousands) | |||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | |||
Cash and restricted cash | | | $33,373 | | | $33,373 | | | $215,589 |
Total assets | | | 71,393 | | | 71,393 | | | 252,019 |
Total liabilities | | | 63,942 | | | 63,942 | | | 63,492 |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | 7,451 | | | 7,451 | | | 188,527 |
(1) | The pro forma consolidated balance sheet data gives effect to (i) the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and (ii) an increase to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit related to stock-based compensation expense of $35.4 million associated with RSUs for which the service-based vesting condition was satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and for which the liquidity event-related performance vesting condition will be satisfied in connection with this offering. |
(2) | The pro forma as adjusted column in the balance sheet data table above gives effect to (i) the pro forma adjustments set forth above, (ii) the sale and issuance by us of shares of our common stock in this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $19.00 per share, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (iii) the Stock Repurchase. |
(3) | Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $19.00 per share, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would have no impact on our pro forma as adjusted cash and restricted cash, total assets, total liabilities and total stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a result of the Stock Repurchase, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us. An increase or decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us would have no impact on the amount of our pro forma as adjusted cash and restricted cash, total assets, total liabilities, and total stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a result of the Stock Repurchase, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Non-GAAP Measures(1) | | | | | ||
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
Adjusted Net Loss | | | $(11,477) | | | $(15,475) |
Adjusted EPS | | | $(1.53) | | | $(1.86) |
(1) | We present Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS as supplemental measures of our performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss plus (i) income tax benefit, (ii) interest expense, (iii) depreciation expense, (iv) amortization of intangibles, (v) stock-based compensation and (vi) loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary. We define Adjusted Net Loss as net loss plus (i) amortization of intangibles, (ii) stock-based compensation, (iii) loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary and (iv) income tax benefit of adjustments. Adjusted EPS is defined as Adjusted Net Loss on a per share basis using the weighted average diluted shares outstanding and excluding the effect of the Forward Stock Split. |
Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS are intended as supplemental measures of performance that are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. We present Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS because we believe they assist investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on an ongoing basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies. |
Among other limitations, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS do not reflect (i) our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, and (ii) the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations. Further, the adjustments noted in Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact of any income tax expense or benefit. Additionally, other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS differently than we do, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and you should not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. These non-GAAP financial measures, when presented, are reconciled to the most closely applicable GAAP measure as disclosed below. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
Income tax benefit | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Interest expense, net(a) | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Depreciation expense | | | 12 | | | 13 |
Amortization of intangibles(b) | | | 400 | | | 33 |
Stock-based compensation(c) | | | 906 | | | 1,818 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary(d) | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
(a) | Represents interest expense, annual amortization of debt issuance cost and loss on debt extinguishment in connection with our Secured Promissory Notes (as defined herein), and a revolving line of credit with Western Alliance Bank. See “Non-Operating Expenses and Other Items—Interest Expense” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” |
(b) | Represents amortization expense related to developed technology. |
(c) | Represents stock-based compensation expense. See “Executive and Director Compensation.” |
(d) | Represents results of an entity that we do not consolidate, as our management excludes these results when evaluating our operating performance. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |||||||
| | Loss | | | EPS | | | Loss | | | EPS | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Net loss and EPS | | | $(13,495) | | | (1.79) | | | $(15,924) | | | (1.91) |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 400 | | | 0.05 | | | 33 | | | — |
Stock-based compensation | | | 906 | | | 0.12 | | | 1,818 | | | 0.22 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | 0.09 | | | (1,399) | | | (0.17) |
Income tax expense of adjustments(a) | | | 3 | | | — | | | (3) | | | — |
Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS | | | $(11,477) | | | (1.53) | | | $(15,475) | | | (1.86) |
Adjusted effective tax rate(b) | | | 0.36% | | | | | 0.50% | | |
(a) | Represents incremental tax expense of adjustments assuming the adjusted effective tax rate. |
(b) | Represents the adjusted effective tax rate for the periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the effective tax rate of 0.29% was increased by 0.07% to 0.36% and for the year ended December 31, 2020, the effective tax rate of 0.36% was increased by 0.14% to 0.50%. The increases were due to the impact of adjustments made for loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary. |
• | the cost competitiveness, reliability and performance of solar energy systems compared to conventional and non-solar renewable energy sources and products; |
• | the availability, scale and scope of federal, state, local and foreign government subsidies and incentives to support the development and deployment of solar energy products; |
• | prices of traditional carbon-based energy sources and government subsidies for these sources; |
• | the extent to which the electric power industry and broader energy industries are deregulated to permit broader adoption of solar electricity generation; |
• | investment by end-users of solar energy products, which tends to decrease when economic growth slows; and |
• | the emergence, continuance or success of, or increased government support for, other alternative energy generation technologies and products. |
• | our ability to produce solar tracker systems that compete favorably against other products on the basis of price, quality, cost of installation, overall cost savings, reliability and performance; |
• | the rate and extent of deployment of tracker systems versus fixed-tilt ground-mounted systems within the solar industry, especially in international markets; |
• | the rate and extent of deployment of two-panel in-portrait tracker systems versus one-panel in-portrait tracker systems; |
• | our ability to timely introduce new products and complete new designs, and qualify and certify our products; |
• | whether project developers, solar asset owners, EPC contractors and solar financing providers will continue to adopt and finance our solar tracker systems and other products and services, including as a result of the quality, reliability and performance of our tracker systems that are in operation, which have a relatively limited history; |
• | the ability of prospective customers to obtain financing, including tax equity financing, for solar energy installations using our products on acceptable terms or at all; |
• | our ability to develop products and related processes that comply with local standards and regulatory requirements, as well as local content requirements; and |
• | our ability to develop and maintain successful relationships with our customers and contract manufacturers. |
• | construction of a significant number of new, lower-cost power generation plants, including plants utilizing natural gas, renewable energy or other generation technologies; |
• | relief of transmission constraints that enable distant, lower-cost generation to transmit energy less expensively or in greater quantities; |
• | reductions in the price of natural gas or other fuels; |
• | utility rate adjustment and customer class cost reallocation; |
• | decreased electricity demand, including from energy conservation technologies and public initiatives to reduce electricity consumption; |
• | development of smart-grid technologies that lower peak energy requirements; |
• | development of new or lower-cost customer-sited energy storage technologies that have the ability to reduce a customer’s average cost of electricity by shifting load to off-peak times; and |
• | development of new energy generation technologies that provide less expensive energy. |
• | difficulty in establishing and managing international operations, including establishment of local customer service operations and local sales operations, and the associated legal compliance costs; |
• | risks related to the usage of international sales representatives, who are not our employees and not under our direct control, including legal compliance risks and reputational risks; |
• | acceptance of our single-axis tracker systems or other solar energy products and services in markets in which they have not traditionally been used; |
• | our ability to accurately forecast product demand and manage manufacturing capacity and production; |
• | willingness of our potential customers to incur a higher upfront capital investment for Voyager than may be required for competing fixed-tilt ground-mounted systems; |
• | our ability to reduce production costs to price our products competitively; |
• | availability of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar energy products and services; |
• | timely qualification and certification of new products; |
• | the ability to protect and enforce intellectual property rights abroad; |
• | compliance with sanctions laws and anti-bribery laws, such as the FCPA, by us, our employees, our sales representatives and our business partners; |
• | import and export controls and restrictions and changes in trade regulations; |
• | tariffs and other non-tariff barriers, tax consequences and local content requirements; |
• | fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the requirements of currency control regulations, which might restrict or prohibit conversion of other currencies into U.S. dollars; and |
• | political or social unrest or economic instability in a specific country or region in which we operate. |
• | diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to addressing acquisition integration challenges; |
• | retention of key employees from the acquired company; |
• | failure to realize long-term value and synergies from the acquisition; |
• | failure to realize incremental revenue that was anticipated to result from the acquisition; |
• | synchronization and integration of the operations of the acquired company with our operations, including blending of corporate cultures; |
• | assumption of liabilities for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition; and |
• | litigation or other claims in connection with the acquisition, including claims from terminated employees, customers, former stockholders or other third parties. |
• | the imposition of additional trade laws, regulations, duties, tariffs and other charges on imports and exports that could relate to imports from a number of different countries, including as a result of the escalating trade war between China and the United States; |
• | the potential imposition of restrictions on our acquisition, importation or installation of equipment under future U.S. regulations implementing the Executive Order on Securing the United States Bulk-Power System; |
• | quotas imposed by bilateral trade agreements; |
• | foreign currency fluctuations; |
• | public health issues and epidemic diseases, their effects (including any disruptions they may cause) or the perception of their effects, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; and |
• | significant labor disputes, such as transportation worker strikes. |
• | changes in laws or regulations applicable to our industry or offerings; |
• | speculation about our business in the press or investment community; |
• | price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market; |
• | volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies in our industry or companies that investors consider comparable; |
• | share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading levels of our common stock; |
• | our ability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights and to avoid infringement, misappropriation or violation of the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties or claims by third parties of such infringement, misappropriation or violation; |
• | sales of our common stock by us or our principal stockholders, officers and directors; |
• | the expiration of contractual lock-up agreements; |
• | the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock; |
• | success of competitive products or services; |
• | the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or others, including our filings with the SEC, announcements relating to litigation or significant changes in our key personnel; |
• | the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting; |
• | changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of debt or equity securities; |
• | our entry into new markets; |
• | tax developments in the U.S. or other markets; |
• | strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; and |
• | changes in accounting principles. |
• | a staggered board, which means that our board of directors is classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms; |
• | limitations on convening special stockholder meetings, which could make it difficult for our stockholders to adopt desired governance changes; |
• | advance notice procedures, which apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders; |
• | a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which means that our stockholders will only be able to take action at a meeting of stockholders; |
• | a forum selection clause, which means certain litigation against us can only be brought in Delaware; |
• | no authorization of cumulative voting, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates; |
• | directors will only be able to be removed for cause; |
• | certain amendments to our certificate of incorporation will require the approval of two-thirds of the then outstanding voting power of our capital stock; |
• | our bylaws will provide that the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the then outstanding voting power of our capital stock, voting as a single class, is required for stockholders to amend or adopt any provision of our bylaws; and |
• | the authorization of undesignated or “blank check” preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without further action by our stockholders. |
• | We did not have a sufficient complement of experienced personnel with the requisite technical knowledge of public company accounting and reporting and for non-routine, unusual or complex transactions. This material weakness contributed to the following material weakness. |
• | We did not design and maintain adequate controls over the period-end close and financial reporting process including establishment of accounting policies and procedures, certain account reconciliations, cut-off, segregation of duties, journal entries and financial statement preparation. This material weakness contributed to material adjustments in the 2019 consolidated financial statements principally, but not limited to, the following areas: definite-lived intangibles, warranty obligation, cut-off of revenue transactions and related cost of sales. |
• | We did not design and maintain effective information technology general controls over the IT systems used for preparation of the financial statements. Specifically, we did not design and maintain (i) program change management controls to ensure that information technology program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately; (ii) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and that adequately restrict user and privileged access to financial applications, programs and data to appropriate Company personnel; and (iii) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements. |
• | $181.0 million for general corporate purposes, including working capital and operating expenses. We may also use a portion of such proceeds to acquire or invest in businesses, products, services or technologies, however, we do not have binding agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions or investments at this time. |
• | $140.3 million to purchase an aggregate of 7,894,735 shares of our common stock (or $189.3 million to purchase 10,657,892 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), some of which will result from the settlement of certain vested RSUs and the exercise of certain options in connection with this offering, from the Stock Repurchase Parties at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. |
• | on an actual basis; |
• | on a pro forma basis to give effect to (i) the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation in Delaware immediately prior to the closing of this offering, (ii) an increase to additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit related to stock-based compensation expense of $35.4 million associated with the RSUs for which the service-based vesting condition was satisfied as of December 31, 2020 and for which the liquidity event-related performance vesting condition will be satisfied in connection with this offering, in each case as if such event had occurred on December 31, 2020 and (iii) the Forward Stock Split; and |
• | on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to the adjustments described in the preceding clause and to reflect (i) the issuance and sale of 18,421,053 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $19.00 per share of common stock, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (ii) the Stock Repurchase. |
| | As of December 31, 2020 | |||||||
| | Actual | | | Pro Forma | | | Pro Forma As Adjusted | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Cash and restricted cash | | | $33,373 | | | $33,373 | | | $215,589 |
Debt: | | | | | | | |||
Line of credit | | | $1,000 | | | $1,000 | | | $1,000 |
Paycheck Protection Program loan | | | 784 | | | 784 | | | 784 |
Total debt | | | 1,784 | | | 1,784 | | | 1,784 |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | | | | |||
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share: 12,000,000 shares authorized, 8,022,066 shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis, 98,960,060 shares authorized, 66,155,328 shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis, 98,960,060 shares authorized, 80,907,007 shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma as adjusted basis | | | 1 | | | 7 | | | 9 |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 50,096 | | | 85,446 | | | 266,520 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (3) | | | (3) | | | (3) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (42,643) | | | (77,999) | | | (77,999) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | 7,451 | | | 7,451 | | | 188,527 |
Total capitalization | | | $9,235 | | | $9,235 | | | $190,311 |
Assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock | | | | | $19.00 | |
Pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock as of December 31, 2020 | | | $0.11 | | | |
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock attributable to investors in this offering | | | $2.22 | | | |
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock after giving effect to this offering | | | | | 2.33 | |
Dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock to new investors in this offering | | | | | $16.67 |
| | Shares Purchased | | | Total Consideration | | | Average Price Per Share | |||||||
| | Number | | | Percent | | | Amount | | | Percent | | |||
Existing stockholders | | | 62,485,954 | | | 77% | | | $37,781 | | | 10% | | | $0.60 |
New investors | | | 18,421,053 | | | 23 | | | 350,000 | | | 90 | | | 19.00 |
Total | | | 80,907,007 | | | 100% | | | $387,781 | | | 100% | | | $4.79 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
Income tax benefit | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Interest expense, net(a) | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Depreciation expense | | | 12 | | | 13 |
Amortization of intangibles(b) | | | 400 | | | 33 |
Stock-based compensation(c) | | | 906 | | | 1,818 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary(d) | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
(a) | Represents interest expense, annual amortization of debt issuance cost and loss on debt extinguishment in connection with our Secured Promissory Notes, and a revolving line of credit with Western Alliance Bank. See “Non-Operating Expenses and Other Items—Interest Expense” below |
(b) | Represents amortization expense related to developed technology. |
(c) | Represents stock-based compensation expense. See “Executive and Director Compensation.” |
(d) | Represents results of an entity that we do not consolidate, as our management excludes these results when evaluating our operating performance. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |||||||
| | Loss | | | EPS | | | Loss | | | EPS | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Net loss and EPS | | | $(13,495) | | | (1.79) | | | $(15,924) | | | (1.91) |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 400 | | | 0.05 | | | 33 | | | — |
Stock-based compensation | | | 906 | | | 0.12 | | | 1,818 | | | 0.22 |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | 0.09 | | | (1,399) | | | (0.17) |
Income tax expense of adjustments(a) | | | 3 | | | — | | | (3) | | | — |
Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted EPS | | | $(11,477) | | | (1.53) | | | $(15,475) | | | (1.86) |
Adjusted effective tax rate(b) | | | 0.36% | | | | | 0.50% | | |
(a) | Represents incremental tax expense of adjustments assuming the adjusted effective tax rate. |
(b) | Represents the adjusted effective tax rate for the periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the effective tax increased by 0.07% to 0.36% and for the year ended December 31, 2020, the effective tax rate of 0.36% was increased by 0.14% to 0.50%. The increases were due to the impact of adjustments made for loss (income) from unconsolidated subsidiary. |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product revenue | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 |
Service revenue | | | 10,039 | | | 28,427 |
Total revenue | | | 53,124 | | | 187,352 |
Cost of Revenue | | | | | ||
Product cost of revenue | | | 44,212 | | | 155,967 |
Service cost of revenue | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 55,075 | | | 183,713 |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development(a) | | | 3,960 | | | 5,222 |
Selling and marketing(a) | | | 1,897 | | | 3,545 |
General and administrative(a) | | | 4,563 | | | 11,798 |
Total operating expenses | | | 10,420 | | | 20,565 |
Loss from operations | | | (12,371) | | | (16,926) |
Interest expense, net | | | 454 | | | 480 |
Loss before income taxes | | | (12,825) | | | (17,406) |
Benefit from income taxes | | | (39) | | | (83) |
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 709 | | | (1,399) |
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) |
| | | | |||
Non-GAAP Measures | | | | | ||
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $(11,053) | | | $(15,062) |
Adjusted Net Loss | | | $(11,477) | | | $(15,475) |
Adjusted EPS | | | $(1.53) | | | $(1.86) |
(a) | Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
Cost of revenue | | | $176 | | | $322 |
Research and development | | | 51 | | | 57 |
Selling and marketing | | | 26 | | | 38 |
General and administrative | | | 653 | | | 1,401 |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | $906 | | | $1,818 |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (as a percentage of revenue) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | ||
Product revenue | | | 81% | | | 85% |
Service revenue | | | 19 | | | 15 |
Total revenue | | | 100 | | | 100 |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | ||
Product cost of revenue | | | 83 | | | 83 |
Service cost of revenue | | | 21 | | | 15 |
Total cost of revenue | | | 104 | | | 98 |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (4) | | | 2 |
Operating expenses | | | | | ||
Research and development | | | 7 | | | 3 |
Selling and marketing | | | 4 | | | 2 |
General and administrative | | | 9 | | | 6 |
Total operating expenses | | | 20 | | | 11 |
Loss from operations | | | (24) | | | (9) |
Interest expense, net | | | 1 | | | — |
Loss before income taxes | | | (25) | | | (9) |
Benefit from income taxes | | | — | | | |
Loss (Gain) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | 1 | | | (1) |
Net loss | | | (26)% | | | (8)% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Product revenue | | | $43,085 | | | $158,925 | | | $115,840 | | | 269% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Service revenue | | | $10,039 | | | $28,427 | | | $18,388 | | | 183% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Product cost of revenue | | | $44,212 | | | $155,967 | | | $111,755 | | | 253% |
Service cost of revenue | | | 10,863 | | | 27,746 | | | 16,883 | | | 155% |
Total cost of revenue | | | $55,075 | | | $183,713 | | | $128,638 | | | 234% |
Gross (loss) profit | | | (1,951) | | | 3,639 | | | 5,590 | | | 287% |
Gross margin | | | (4)% | | | 2% | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Research and development | | | $3,960 | | | $5,222 | | | $1,262 | | | 32% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Selling and marketing | | | $1,897 | | | $3,545 | | | $1,648 | | | 87% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
General and administrative | | | $4,563 | | | $11,798 | | | $7,235 | | | 159% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Interest expense, net | | | $454 | | | $480 | | | $26 | | | 6% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Loss (Income) from unconsolidated subsidiary | | | $709 | | | $(1,399) | | | $(2,108) | | | (297)% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | ||||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | ||||||
Net loss | | | $(13,495) | | | $(15,924) | | | $(2,429) | | | 18% |
| | Years Ended December 31, | ||||
| | 2019 | | | 2020 | |
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | | | $(254) | | | $(511) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | | (18) | | | 1,868 |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 7,000 | | | 23,784 |
Effect on exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | | | — | | | (3) |
Increase in cash and restricted cash | | | $ 6,728 | | | $25,138 |
• | contemporaneous third party valuations of our common stock; |
• | the prices at which we or other holders sold our common stock to outside investors in arms-length transactions; |
• | our financial condition, results of operations and capital resources; |
• | the industry outlook; |
• | the fact that option and restricted stock awards involve rights in illiquid securities in a private company; |
• | the valuation of comparable companies; |
• | the lack of marketability of our common stock; |
• | the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale of our company given prevailing market conditions; |
• | the history and nature of our business, industry trends and competitive environment; and |
• | general economic outlook including economic growth, inflation, unemployment, interest rate environment and global economic trends. |